2004
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pex5p binding affinities for canonical and noncanonical PTS1 peptides

Abstract: The majority of proteins targeted to the peroxisomal lumen contain a C-terminal peroxisomal targeting signal-1 (PTS1) that is bound by the peroxin Pex5p. The PTS1 is generally regarded as a C-terminal tripeptide that adheres to the consensus (S/A/C)(K/R/H)(L/M). Previously, we studied the binding affinity of peptides of the form YQX(-3)X(-2)X(-1) to the peptide-binding domain of human Pex5p (referred to as Pex5p-C). Optimal affinity was found for YQSKL, which bound with an affinity of 200 +/- 40 nM. To extend … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Alanine:glyoxylate aminotransferase is targeted by two signals (Huber et al, 2005); a C-terminal KKKL motif and an internal eightamino-acid sequence, both of which are predicted to be separately located on the surface of the protein (Ikeda et al, 2008). Sequences immediately upstream of the C-terminal tripeptide appear to contribute to specificity, especially when the match to the consensus tripeptide deviates (Maynard et al, 2004;Ma and Reumann, 2008).…”
Section: Pts1 (Peroxisomal Targeting Signal 1) Pathwaymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alanine:glyoxylate aminotransferase is targeted by two signals (Huber et al, 2005); a C-terminal KKKL motif and an internal eightamino-acid sequence, both of which are predicted to be separately located on the surface of the protein (Ikeda et al, 2008). Sequences immediately upstream of the C-terminal tripeptide appear to contribute to specificity, especially when the match to the consensus tripeptide deviates (Maynard et al, 2004;Ma and Reumann, 2008).…”
Section: Pts1 (Peroxisomal Targeting Signal 1) Pathwaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only interactions that are supported by quantitative data are for mammalian PEX5-PTS1 (K d ∼200 nM) (Gatto et al, 2000;Madrid et al, 2004;Maynard et al, 2004); and mammalian PEX5-PEX14 (K d ∼low nanomolar) (Schliebs et al, 1999;Saidowsky et al, 2001). One PEX5 molecule binds multiple PEX14 molecules simultaneously, as there are multiple binding sites for PEX14 on PEX5 (Schliebs et al, 1999).…”
Section: Stoichiometry Affinity and Order Of Binding Interactions Ammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to in vitro studies using fluorescence anisotropy, the SKM tripeptide has a lower binding affinity to the PTS1 receptor Pex5p than SKL, but is more potent than SKI (the PTS1 in rat and mouse sEH). 26,29 In order to compare the peroxisomal import efficiency of the three PTS1s in vivo, GFP-WT hsEH was expressed in CHO-K1 cells with SKL, SKM or SKI as PTS1. At all three time points during the 72 hour time-course of transient expression, more GFP-WT hsEH(SKL) was found in peroxisomes compared to GFP-WT hsEH(SKM) and GFP-WT hsEH(SKI) (Fig.…”
Section: Skm Is a Less Efficient Pts1 Than Skl In Wt Hsehmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas in the case of the latter, amino acids in close proximity (i.e. within 10 -20 residues) to the C-terminal tripeptide can markedly influence the properties of, and allowable residues within, the PTS1 (16,17,(32)(33)(34)(35). The importance of specific residues near the C terminus appears to be particularly important if the C-terminal tripeptide deviates from the conservative consensus PTS1 (16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%