2018
DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PF-06827443 Displays Robust Allosteric Agonist and Positive Allosteric Modulator Activity in High Receptor Reserve and Native Systems

Abstract: Positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) of the M subtype of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor have attracted intense interest as an exciting new approach for improving the cognitive deficits in schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease. Recent evidence suggests that the presence of intrinsic agonist activity of some M PAMs may reduce efficacy and contribute to adverse effect liability. However, the M PAM PF-06827443 was reported to have only weak agonist activity at human M receptors but produced M-dependent adverse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, we found that the presence of allosteric agonist activity in M1 PAMs can limit in vivo efficacy and increase adverse effect liability (13,14,19,20). Thus, minimalizing agonist activity can maximize the therapeutic window of M1 PAMs (13,(19)(20)(21). These previous studies demonstrate that a complete understanding of the different pharmacological properties of structurally distinct M1 PAMs is essential to fully evaluate clinical candidates and maximize their therapeutic potential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previously, we found that the presence of allosteric agonist activity in M1 PAMs can limit in vivo efficacy and increase adverse effect liability (13,14,19,20). Thus, minimalizing agonist activity can maximize the therapeutic window of M1 PAMs (13,(19)(20)(21). These previous studies demonstrate that a complete understanding of the different pharmacological properties of structurally distinct M1 PAMs is essential to fully evaluate clinical candidates and maximize their therapeutic potential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…While these preclinical findings are extremely promising for the potential of M1 PAMs to reverse cognitive deficits in patients, M1 PAMs can display a diverse range of pharmacological properties, some of which are potentially detrimental to in vivo efficacy. Previously, we found that the presence of allosteric agonist activity in M1 PAMs can limit in vivo efficacy and increase adverse effect liability (13,14,19,20). Thus, minimalizing agonist activity can maximize the therapeutic window of M1 PAMs (13,(19)(20)(21).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first amide moiety surveyed was the (3S,4R)-3hydroxy-4 amino tetrahydropyranyl (THP) amide, well documented to engender potent M 1 PAMs, but with undesired potent M 1 agonist activity. 11,[13][14][15][16][17]19 As we previously reported, M 1 PAM potencies below 100 nM, coupled with M 1 agonist activity, generally lead to robust cholinergic AEs. 19 As anticipated, analogs 14 ( Table 1) with diverse southern heterobiaryl tails provided potent M 1 ago-PAMs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the analogous cyclohexyl congener 15 of THP 14 generally afforded a lower degree of M 1 agonism, we next evaluated such analogs. As shown in Table 2, analogs 15 were also potent M 1 ago-PAMs (15a−c), but with reduced M 1 agonism relative to 14, 11,[13][14][15][16][17]19 as well as a moderately potent M 1 PAM (15d). Interestingly, both 15b and 15c were not CNS penetrant in rat, with K p values below level of quantitation (BLQ), despite favorable CNS MPO scores (4−5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, cooperativity, but not agonist activity, of M 1 R PAMs may contribute to the improved and superior pharmacological profile. However, to more precisely quantify agonist activity, physiological receptors in brain slices and primary cells, rather than cell lines, should be used, because agonist activity is greatly affected by various factors including the degree of receptor reserve . Unfortunately, only low‐throughout electrophysiological assays using brain slices are available for characterization of the agonist activity of M 1 R PAMs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%