2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12325-020-01387-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PF-06881894, a Proposed Biosimilar to Pegfilgrastim, Versus US-Licensed and EU-Approved Pegfilgrastim Reference Products (Neulasta®): Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacokinetics, Immunogenicity, and Safety of Single or Multiple Subcutaneous Doses in Healthy Volunteers

Abstract: Introduction: PF-06881894 is a proposed biosimilar to pegfilgrastim (Neulasta Ò). This study evaluated the pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic (PD/PK) equivalence, immunogenicity, and safety of PF-06881894 vs pegfilgrastim reference products (US-and EU-Neulasta Ò) in healthy volunteers. Methods: A phase 1, open-label, randomized, crossover study was conducted to assess the pharmacologic equivalence and safety of a single 6-mg dose of PF-06881894, pegfilgrastim-US, and pegfilgrastim-EU. The primary PD endpoints wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results for platelet counts were consistent with those for US-and EU-pegfilgrastim reference products. Results for PF-06881894 in healthy volunteers demonstrated return of counts to baseline levels by follow-up visit [25], and was also demonstrated in Phase II of this study. In addition, the observed clinical laboratory findings and safety profile were consistent with the known therapeutic response for the USand EU-approved pegfilgrastim reference product (Neulasta) [25,37].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results for platelet counts were consistent with those for US-and EU-pegfilgrastim reference products. Results for PF-06881894 in healthy volunteers demonstrated return of counts to baseline levels by follow-up visit [25], and was also demonstrated in Phase II of this study. In addition, the observed clinical laboratory findings and safety profile were consistent with the known therapeutic response for the USand EU-approved pegfilgrastim reference product (Neulasta) [25,37].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The methodology for antibody detection (Online Resource Methods S1) has been described previously by Moosavi et al . [ 25 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are also key to guiding the requirement for, and nature of, subsequent comparative clinical studies [ 31 ]. The proportion of PK/PD queries was unaffected whether the study was conducted in patients (such as for PF-rituximab [ 32 ]) or in healthy subjects (PF-infliximab [Ixifi ™ ] [ 33 ], PF-epoetin [ 34 , 35 ], PF-filgrastim [ 36 ], PF-trastuzumab [ 37 ], PF-bevacizumab [ 38 ], PF-adalimumab [Abrilada ™ /Amsparity] [ 39 ], PF-pegfilgrastim [Nyvepria ™ ] [ 40 ]). The generally low focus on PK information across RAs may reflect the proactive engagement of the applicant with the relevant RA during the study design process, the transparency of the data disclosure and interpretation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…US pegfilgrastim. Pegfilgrastim-apgf was shown to be noninferior to US pegfilgrastim, and there was no clinically meaningful difference in safety between the two study groups ( Moosavi et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Clinical Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%