2021
DOI: 10.3390/app11041406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PFDA-FMEA, an Integrated Method Improving FMEA Assessment in Product Design

Abstract: Product Design (PD) currently faces challenges in new product development, since the industry is in a rush to introduce new products into the market, with customers demanding products that are faster, cheaper, and free from failure. In addition, global companies are trying to improve their product design risk assessment process to gain advantages over competitors, using proven tools like Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) and mixing risk assessment methods. However, with current risks assessment tools and… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The basic concept of PFS, which are also used in the case study, is presented through the following definitions (Yager, 2013;Cao et al, 2013;García-Aguirre et al, 2021b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic concept of PFS, which are also used in the case study, is presented through the following definitions (Yager, 2013;Cao et al, 2013;García-Aguirre et al, 2021b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FMEA is a simple method that especially low-education employees can participate in and understand the process. It is a method widely used in various sectors such as automotive, manufacturing, food, chemistry, and product design [74,[76][77][78][79][80].…”
Section: Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (Fmea)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the methods of concept design evaluation have been continuously optimized, the evaluation criteria used in these studies are still mainly based on traditional survey methods such as expert opinion 34 , 36 , 44 , literature review 4 , 34 , 37 , 41 and questionnaires 18 , 35 , which are feasible but have obvious drawbacks such as time-consuming, slow feedback, low user involvement, and small research These methods are feasible but have obvious drawbacks, such as time-consuming, slow feedback, low user participation, and small scope. A prerequisite for effective methods to obtain accurate and objective product concept evaluation results is the establishment of comprehensive and objective evaluation criteria.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%