2006
DOI: 10.1002/aic.10891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

pH‐sensitive flocculation: Settling rates and sediment densities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Obviously, PNIPAM has an advantage over PAM because it produces denser sediments and slightly faster settling. Therefore, more water can be recovered, although the consolidation stage will take some time (typically 3 h or less) 15. The only disadvantages of using PNIPAM are that the supernatant clarity is not as good as conventional PAM and the cost of PNIPAM may be more than conventional polymeric flocculants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Obviously, PNIPAM has an advantage over PAM because it produces denser sediments and slightly faster settling. Therefore, more water can be recovered, although the consolidation stage will take some time (typically 3 h or less) 15. The only disadvantages of using PNIPAM are that the supernatant clarity is not as good as conventional PAM and the cost of PNIPAM may be more than conventional polymeric flocculants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of novel flocculants with better performance than PAM would be useful in managing tailings dewatering. One class of new flocculants are stimuli‐sensitive polymers,13, 14 such as chitosan and Polyacrylicacid (pH‐sensitive polymers),15 methylcellulose (a low MW temperature‐sensitive polymer),14 and poly( N ‐isopropyl acrylamide) (PNIPAM) (a temperature‐sensitive polymer) 2, 13, 16–19. These polymers have been tested in flocculating for example, TiO 2 with a 2 × 10 5 Da MW (weight average MW) PNIPAM,17 kaolin with a 3.95 × 10 6 Da MW (number or weight average not specified) PNIPAM,18 zircon with an 86,000 Da MW (approximately according to the manufacturer) methylcellulose,14 and kaolinite with 3.2 × 10 6 Da M n (number average MW) PNIPAM 19.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexity of the surface modification is not an issue for applications such as biofilm growth prevention. , However, for industrial applications such as mineral flotation or tailings treatment, the polymer layers are formed through straightforward adsorption from aqueous solution. In this area, the study and application of stimulus-responsive polymers is still in its infancy, in spite of the potential for stimulus-responsive polymers to improve mineral separation processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference occurred because the positively charged DMDAAC well maintained in side chain of AM/A‐β‐CD/DMDAAC can flocculate the negatively charged kaolin through electrical neutralization . Moreover, the high molecular polymer with β‐CD can extend the chain through intermolecular and intramolecular hydrogen bonds and is more conducive to the settling of flocs …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%