2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmaceuticals removal in an on-farm pig slurry treatment plant based on solid-liquid separation and nitrification-denitrification systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Solid samples: 0.5 g of freeze-dried and ground samples were measured and spiked with standard solutions as reported by Marti et al [ 21 ]. Solid samples were extracted by passing through three different solid extraction solutions, where samples were transferred into a centrifuge tube and 4 mL of extraction buffer was added as follows: (T1): a mixture (50:50 v/v ) of MeOH/ACN and pH adjusted to 3.0; (T2): saturated aqueous Na 2 EDTA, water, and Na 2 EDTA–McIlvaine buffer (pH 4.0) as developed by Li et al [ 7 ]; (T3): a mixture between a McIlvaine buffer (0.1 M Na 2 EDTA) solution, and MeOH at a ratio of 25:25:50 (based on the volume v/v/v ), and pH was adjusted to 7.2 by adding 6N NaOH solution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solid samples: 0.5 g of freeze-dried and ground samples were measured and spiked with standard solutions as reported by Marti et al [ 21 ]. Solid samples were extracted by passing through three different solid extraction solutions, where samples were transferred into a centrifuge tube and 4 mL of extraction buffer was added as follows: (T1): a mixture (50:50 v/v ) of MeOH/ACN and pH adjusted to 3.0; (T2): saturated aqueous Na 2 EDTA, water, and Na 2 EDTA–McIlvaine buffer (pH 4.0) as developed by Li et al [ 7 ]; (T3): a mixture between a McIlvaine buffer (0.1 M Na 2 EDTA) solution, and MeOH at a ratio of 25:25:50 (based on the volume v/v/v ), and pH was adjusted to 7.2 by adding 6N NaOH solution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digestate was collected from an on-farm livestock waste treatment plant where pig slurry, slaughterhouse sludge and food waste are fed into a mesophilic anaerobic digestor with a working volume of 5000 m 3 and a hydraulic retention time of 75-80 d [30]. The liquid fraction from pig slurry was collected in a fattening pig farm where mechanical solid-liquid separation with a press screw separator is undertaken [31]. Before its treatment with the VSEP system, the liquid fraction from pig slurry was screened using a SWECO vibrating screen provided by New Logic Research, Inc. (Emeryville, CA, USA) with a screen size down to 120 µm in order to remove abrasive solids which could damage the membranes and pumps integrated in the VSEP unit.…”
Section: Selection Of Feedstocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best way to manage them is by their destruction before they leave the farm. Several methods are being studied to avoid antibiotic release, such as heating [30,31], sorption of antibiotics onto carbonaceous materials [18], anaerobic digestion [32,33], manure composting [34,35], solid-liquid separation [36], and Fenton reaction [37]. These procedures involve a series of technologies, the choice of which will be dependent on the antimicrobial used and the concentration excreted, which, in turn, will depend on the moment of therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%