1988
DOI: 10.1016/s0749-0690(18)30769-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacodynamic Basis for Altered Drug Action in the Elderly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…41,42 These, coupled with the ongoing neuropathology of AD, 43 potentially contributed to the decreased drug response seen with the high dose in the present study. 42,44 The 15-mg/d dose of olanzapine demonstrated a negative effect on tolerability and potentially affected efficacy.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…41,42 These, coupled with the ongoing neuropathology of AD, 43 potentially contributed to the decreased drug response seen with the high dose in the present study. 42,44 The 15-mg/d dose of olanzapine demonstrated a negative effect on tolerability and potentially affected efficacy.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…A small change in drug blood concentrations from drug interactions can be significant in elderly patients because of age-related pharmacodynamic alterations. Many drugs, such as opioids, anticholinergic agents, and benzodiazepines have exaggerated actions in older people [13][14][15]. This enhanced sensitivity to drug effects are often exhibited as adverse reactions.…”
Section: Aging Physiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, people of different ages were of diverse physical states, hence the responses to drug treatment might be quite different, even opposite. The elderly patients often have a higher prevalence of adverse drug reactions than younger ones (Roberts and Tumer, 1988), so the efficacies of rhubarb on these people are different. These differences in tolerability or efficacy may be attributable to age-related physiological changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%