2011
DOI: 10.1136/vr.d4012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetic interactions of marbofloxacin with anti‐inflammatory drugs in buffalo calves

Abstract: ANTIMICROBIAL agents are usually combined with NSAIDs to treat various systemic infections accompanied by fever and other inflammatory conditions. They can also be administered with steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (SAIDs) to relieve suffering caused by inflammation. A pharmacological interaction between the two types of drug has been described in previous studies (Post and others 2002, 2003, Sidhu and others 2010, Ogino and others 2005). The combined use of anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial drugs is common… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the doses were intravenously administered to eliminate the effect of bioavailability on the pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin. Similarly, no adverse effects have been reported following the simultaneous administration of NSAIDs and fluoroquinolone antibiotics in buffalo calves (Baroni et al, ) and dogs (Ogino et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the present study, the doses were intravenously administered to eliminate the effect of bioavailability on the pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin. Similarly, no adverse effects have been reported following the simultaneous administration of NSAIDs and fluoroquinolone antibiotics in buffalo calves (Baroni et al, ) and dogs (Ogino et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Time immediately before administration of the first dose of marbofloxacin was designated as time 0. in this species. [10][11][12] An accumulation process was not observed with regimen 1, as determined on the basis of Cmax (AI, 0.85 ± 0.17 µg/mL) and AUC (AI, 0.96 ± 0.17 µg•h/mL). An accumulation process was not observed with regimens 2 and 3, and there were no significant differences for the AI of Cmax (P = 0.237) and AUC (P = 0.472).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For calves administered marbofloxacin in accordance with regimen 2, blood samples were collected 0, 10, 20, 30, and 45 minutes and 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 28, 32, 36, and 48 hours after the first and second injections as well as 0, 10, 20, 30, and 45 minutes and 1, 1. 5,2,3,4,6,8,10,12,24,28,32,36,48,52,56,60, and 72 hours after the third injection. For calves administered marbofloxacin in accordance with regimen 3, blood samples were collected 0, 10, 20, 30, and 45 minutes and 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 hours after the first and second injections as well as 0, 10, 20, 30, and 45 minutes and 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 28, 32, 36, 48, 52, 56, 60, and 72 hours after the third injection.…”
Section: Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These changes may lead to the development of resistance to antibiotics, the emergence of undesirable effects, and a suboptimal level of drug exposure, leading to failure in the treatment of infection [28,29]. Although there are many studies investigating the effects of NSAIDs on the pharmacokinetics of antibiotics in healthy animals [30][31][32][33][34][35][36], studies conducted in the case of disease are limited [37][38][39]. We hypothesized that the effect of meloxicam on the pharmacokinetics of danofloxacin will change with the systemic inflammatory response caused by respiratory infection in lambs, and that the results obtained will contribute to the rational use of danofloxacin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%