1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf00166957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetic properties of the antimuscarinic drug [3H]-hexahydro-sila-difenidol in the rat

Abstract: Summary. The pharmacokinetics of tritiated hexahydrosila-difenidol ([ 3 H]-HHSiD) were examined in rats. Furthermore, the distribution of radioactivity was studied by means of whole body autoradiography.After i. v. administration of 2.9 mg/kg HHSiD plus [ 3 H]-HHSiD to anaesthetized rats bearing a catheter implanted in the ductus choledochus and receiving a mannitol infusion, HHSiD was rapidly distributed and metabolized. Only 5% ofthe radioactivity was recovered in blood after 23 s and 0.4% after 2.5 h. 64% o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1995
1995
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this antagonist is selective for M 3 receptors, the magnitude of the selectivity is not great, as illustrated by the HR/RL ED 50 ratio (Table 2) and in vitro studies of selectivity (Dorje et al 1991;Waelbroeck et al 1991;Buckley et al 1989;Eltze and Galvan 1994). Furthermore, the potency of the parent compound in vivo has been suggested to be less than expected as a result of rapid metabolism (Rettenmayer et al 1990). Although highly selective antagonists of the M 3 muscarinic receptor subtype are not yet available (Dorje et al 1991;Waelbroeck et al 1991;Buckley et al 1989;Eltze and Galvan 1994), current consensus suggests that M 3 antagonists would eliminate the untoward effects of nonspecific antagonists such as ipratropium bromide (Barnes 1993a;Loenders et al 1992).…”
Section: Af-dx 116 P-f-hhsid Pirenzepine Atropinementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although this antagonist is selective for M 3 receptors, the magnitude of the selectivity is not great, as illustrated by the HR/RL ED 50 ratio (Table 2) and in vitro studies of selectivity (Dorje et al 1991;Waelbroeck et al 1991;Buckley et al 1989;Eltze and Galvan 1994). Furthermore, the potency of the parent compound in vivo has been suggested to be less than expected as a result of rapid metabolism (Rettenmayer et al 1990). Although highly selective antagonists of the M 3 muscarinic receptor subtype are not yet available (Dorje et al 1991;Waelbroeck et al 1991;Buckley et al 1989;Eltze and Galvan 1994), current consensus suggests that M 3 antagonists would eliminate the untoward effects of nonspecific antagonists such as ipratropium bromide (Barnes 1993a;Loenders et al 1992).…”
Section: Af-dx 116 P-f-hhsid Pirenzepine Atropinementioning
confidence: 95%