2011
DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.72.1.122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of cefquinome in healthy ducks

Abstract: Results indicated that cefquinome was absorbed quickly and had excellent bioavailability after IM administration, but absorption after PO administration was poor.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

13
51
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
13
51
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The reported terminal half life, clearance and Vss were respectively 2.4 ± 0.21 h, 0.11 ± 0.03 L/h.kg, 0.3 ± 0.5 L/kg and were very close to our values. The terminal elimination half-life of cefquinome is similar to values that were observed in piglet (Zhang et al, 2014), ducks (Liguo et al, 2011), rabbit (Hwang et al, 2011), and horses (Winther et al, 2011) in the range of (0.9–2.77 h) following IV administration. The volume of distribution at steady state was low which means that cefquinome was not as widely distributed as previously reported for piglet (Zhang et al, 2014), sheep (Uney et al, 2011), rabbits (Hwang et al, 2011), and horses (Winther et al, 2011) in the range (0.19–0.36 L/kg).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reported terminal half life, clearance and Vss were respectively 2.4 ± 0.21 h, 0.11 ± 0.03 L/h.kg, 0.3 ± 0.5 L/kg and were very close to our values. The terminal elimination half-life of cefquinome is similar to values that were observed in piglet (Zhang et al, 2014), ducks (Liguo et al, 2011), rabbit (Hwang et al, 2011), and horses (Winther et al, 2011) in the range of (0.9–2.77 h) following IV administration. The volume of distribution at steady state was low which means that cefquinome was not as widely distributed as previously reported for piglet (Zhang et al, 2014), sheep (Uney et al, 2011), rabbits (Hwang et al, 2011), and horses (Winther et al, 2011) in the range (0.19–0.36 L/kg).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The advantages of cefquinome include broad spectrum antibacterial activity, stability against β-lactamase, enhanced potency, and bioavailability and the ability to penetrate easily into gram negative bacteria (Dumka et al, 2013). Cefquinome pharmacokinetics (PK) have been studied in several animal species such as camels, horses, ducks, cows, wild boars, piglet, rabbits and cattle (Allan and Thomas, 2003; Ehinger et al, 2006; Li et al, 2008; Al-Taher, 2010; Hwang et al, 2011; Liguo et al, 2011; Liu et al, 2012; Shan et al, 2014). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cefquinome was rapidly and almost completely absorbed (F, 103.04 ± 13.01% vs. 97.56 ± 16.14%, P>0.05) following i.m. injection into two different injection sites, which is consistent with the results in ducks, rabbits, wild boars and sheep [10,14,18,21]. In addition, this result was similar to that in a previous report in piglets after a single i.m.…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…This was similar to the findings for other species, the t 1/2λz and Cl of cefquinome ranged from 0.78 to 1.64 hr and 0.18 to 0.34 l/kg/hr in sheep, rabbits, wild boars and duck indicating the rapid elimination of cefquinome after i.v. injection [10,13,14,18,21]. The V ss of cefquinome in this study was 0.25 ± 0.04 l/kg, which was similar to the reported values of 0.23 l/kg in calves, 0.21 l/kg in rabbits and 0.21 l/kg in horses [10,13,19].…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation