2023
DOI: 10.21037/atm-22-6485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of montelukast sodium oral soluble film and chewable tablet in healthy Chinese volunteers: randomized trials under fasting and fed conditions

Abstract: Background The oral soluble film (OSF) is a new drug delivery system. Whether montelukast sodium OSF has similar pharmacokinetic (PK) properties and bioequivalence to chewable tablet (CT) should be investigated. Methods This study, conducted at Haikou People’s Hospital, consisted of two trials: a randomized, open-label, single-dose, 3-sequence, 3-period crossover trial under fasting conditions and a randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-sequence, 2-period crossover tri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It mainly benefits from the enhanced inhibitory effect of montelukast sodium on leukotrienes, which reduces the destructive impact of leukotrienes on the immune system, improves immune capacity, and effectively promotes the rehabilitation of children. 30,31 This result is consistent with similar reports at home and abroad. In this study, we also found that the recovery time of related symptoms in the study group was shorter than that in the control group (P < 0.05), and the difference was prominent.…”
Section: Comparison Of Symptom Recovery Between Both Groupssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It mainly benefits from the enhanced inhibitory effect of montelukast sodium on leukotrienes, which reduces the destructive impact of leukotrienes on the immune system, improves immune capacity, and effectively promotes the rehabilitation of children. 30,31 This result is consistent with similar reports at home and abroad. In this study, we also found that the recovery time of related symptoms in the study group was shorter than that in the control group (P < 0.05), and the difference was prominent.…”
Section: Comparison Of Symptom Recovery Between Both Groupssupporting
confidence: 92%