Background-Pharmacological ventricular rate control is an acceptable atrial fibrillation (AF) therapy limited by systemic toxicity. We postulate that focal catheter-based drug delivery into the atrioventricular nodal (AVN) region may effectively control ventricular rate during AF without systemic toxicity. This study evaluated the effects of focally administered acetylcholine on AVN conduction and refractoriness during sinus rhythm and AF. Methods and Results-Canines (nϭ7) were anesthetized and instrumented to assess cardiac electrophysiology and blood pressure. A custom drug delivery catheter was implanted in the AVN region. Incremental doses of acetylcholine starting at 10 g/min were infused until complete AV block was achieved. Acetylcholine induced dose-dependent AV block. AF induction and electrophysiology measurements were performed during baseline and acetylcholine-induced first-degree and third-degree AV block. During AF, infusion of acetylcholine decreased ventricular rates from 182Ϯ32 to 77Ϯ28 and 28Ϯ8 bpm (first-degree and third-degree AV block, respectively; PϽ0.05). At the first-degree AV block dose, AVN effective refractory period increased from 186Ϯ37 to 282Ϯ33 ms, and Wenckebach cycle length increased from 271Ϯ29 to 378Ϯ58 ms (PϽ0.05). The first-degree AV block dose prolonged AV and AH intervals by 26% and 23% (PϽ0.05), whereas AA intervals and blood pressure remained unchanged, demonstrating a local effect. All effects were reversed 20 minutes after infusion was stopped. Conclusions-Focal acetylcholine delivery into the AVN increased AVN refractoriness and significantly decreased ventricular rate response during induced AF in a dose-related, reversible manner without systemic side effects. This may represent a novel therapy for AF whereby ventricular rate is controlled with the use of an implantable drug delivery system. (Circulation. 2006;113:2383-2390.)Key Words: acetylcholine Ⅲ catheters Ⅲ conduction Ⅲ pharmacology Ⅲ tachyarrhythmias C urrent clinical treatment options for arrhythmias include pharmacotherapy, ablation, and medical devices. Although these therapeutic approaches may have some role in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF), the successful management of this disease remains an unmet clinical need. Ideally, AF should be treated by a strategy of prevention and, if needed, conversion of the arrhythmia to a regular sinus rhythm. However, pharmacological therapies typically fail to prevent AF, particularly in patients with structural heart disease. Data from the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) trial and from other clinical trials suggest that AF management with the rhythm-control strategy offers no survival advantage over rate control and furthermore that rate control may be more advantageous (lower risk of adverse drug effects, lower number of hospitalizations, and lower healthcare burden). 1,2 For supraventricular tachyarrhythmias with fast ventricular response with origin of the focus in the atria, the most
Editorial p 2374 Clinical Pers...