1979
DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1979.tb01641.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetics of Nadolol, a Beta‐Receptor Antagonist: Administration of Therapeutic Single‐ and Multiple‐Dosage Regimens to Hypertensive Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…45.0 + 3.9 and 40.7 + 3.4 ng/ml. In another recently published study (Dreyfuss et al, 1979) of nadolol concentrations in four hypertensive patients, the average concentration of nadolol found in serum 24 h after the fifth daily dose was 38 ng/ml. Serum concentrations in hypertensive patients at 1, 2, 3 and 4 h after the final dose on Day 13 were 61.9 + 10.0, 85.2 + 22.0, 92.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…45.0 + 3.9 and 40.7 + 3.4 ng/ml. In another recently published study (Dreyfuss et al, 1979) of nadolol concentrations in four hypertensive patients, the average concentration of nadolol found in serum 24 h after the fifth daily dose was 38 ng/ml. Serum concentrations in hypertensive patients at 1, 2, 3 and 4 h after the final dose on Day 13 were 61.9 + 10.0, 85.2 + 22.0, 92.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The pharmacokinetics of nadolol in serum have been described previously (Dreyfuss et al, 1979 Each hypertensive patient received an 80 mg nadolol tablet once a day for 13 days. Samples of venous blood were collected immediately prior to the final dose of nadolol and at hourly intervals for the first 4 h after the final nadolol administration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean predicted concentrations of the quality control (QC) samples deviated by (7.6% from the nominal values for both nadolol (50, 199, and 398 ng/mL) and its stereoisomers (14,50, and 80 ng/mL). Regardless of the analyte, the betweenday and the within-day precision estimates were within 9.5% relative standard deviation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The literature [30][31][32] indicates that differences in the pharmacokinetics of enantiomeric substrates can occur due to the presence of (i) an active transport in the absorption process, (ii) a preferential first-pass effect or differential substrate specificity for metabolizing enzymes, (iii) varying degree of binding affinities to plasma proteins and tissue components, and/or (iv) preferential biliary and/or renal excretion. In the case of nadolol, the occurrence of either a preferential first pass effect or a differential substrate specificity for metabolism can be ruled out because 14 C studies in humans have demonstrated negligible metabolism of nadolol. 33,34 Furthermore, since the T 1/2 values were not significantly different among the four isomers, a stereoselective renal/biliary excretory process is not likely.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation