Hunter et al. 1 compared vecuronium and atracurium in patients with normal and absent renal function undergoing a variety of surgical procedures. They found no difference between the two groups in duration of action of either drug and no evidence of accumulation. Fahey et al.2 compared the pharmacokinetics of vecuronium in patients with and without renal failure and found no significant difference in duration or evidence of accumulation between the two groups. Other authors 3'4 have demonstrated that atracurium showed no evidence of accumulation or prolongation of effect in the renal failure patient. However, some studies have shown prolongation of effect ~ and evidence of cumulation 6 with vecuronium in the anephric patient.Since vecuronium is a non-depolarizing relaxant which produces a neuromuscular blockade of short duration and without adverse cardiovascular effects, 2 it would seem ideal for the renal transplant patient. These patients frequently have accompanying multiple organ system disease and the procedure is one during which hypotension can have markedly adverse effects. While the muscle relaxant properties of atracurium and its lack of dependence on renal clearance for elimination make it seem useful for the transplant population, its possible histamine release with concomitant hypotension 7 could limit its use in this group. The purpose of this study is to compare the neuromuscular effects of atracurium and veeuronium in the cadaver renal transplant patient.