1988
DOI: 10.1097/00007691-198803000-00029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacologic Analysis of Drug Receptor Interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
469
2
5

Year Published

1990
1990
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 457 publications
(498 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
22
469
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the curves were clearly shifted rightwards and downwards by compounds 4 or 10, it appears that neither drug could induce competitive receptor antagonism that would have required preservation of the agonist maximum response and parallel shift of the dose response curve to the right. Thus, while the inhibition evoked by AF-353 could be minimally reversed by the P2X3 agonist, the antagonism by compounds 4 or 10 was partially surmounted by the higher agonist concentrations, suggesting a complex mode of pharmacological block in which the non-competitive antagonism process was predominant, yet not exclusive [69]. Nonetheless, in the presence of a competitive antagonist, receptors are prone to fast desensitization (that is strongly dependent on agonist concentration) and therefore might unexpectedly exhibit an apparent noncompetitive antagonism when high agonist doses are used …”
Section: Biological Assaysmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Since the curves were clearly shifted rightwards and downwards by compounds 4 or 10, it appears that neither drug could induce competitive receptor antagonism that would have required preservation of the agonist maximum response and parallel shift of the dose response curve to the right. Thus, while the inhibition evoked by AF-353 could be minimally reversed by the P2X3 agonist, the antagonism by compounds 4 or 10 was partially surmounted by the higher agonist concentrations, suggesting a complex mode of pharmacological block in which the non-competitive antagonism process was predominant, yet not exclusive [69]. Nonetheless, in the presence of a competitive antagonist, receptors are prone to fast desensitization (that is strongly dependent on agonist concentration) and therefore might unexpectedly exhibit an apparent noncompetitive antagonism when high agonist doses are used …”
Section: Biological Assaysmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Furthermore, different experimental conditions can also contribute to the discrepant findings. More generally, the extent to which the action of a competitive antagonist can be overcome by increasing the concentration of agonist is determined by the relative concentrations of two agents, by the association and dissociation rate constants for their binding, and by the duration of exposure of each (see Kenakin, 1997). The action of a competitive antagonist can therefore be surmountable under one set of experimental conditions and ionsurmountable under another.…”
Section: Sheykhzade Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative explanation for the partially surmountable antagonism by BIBN4096BS is that the antagonist, when in close enough proximity to its binding site, may form a covalent bond with it, and the antagonist-receptor complex is then converted into a tight binding slow reversible state (irreversible competitive antagonist). This results in insurmountable antagonism in a system with little or no receptor reserve (see Kenakin, 1997).…”
Section: Sheykhzade Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relatively high pK i values of the latter six compounds can be explained by the fact that, with respect to G protein-coupled receptors, pK i values of agonists are frequently particularly high when an agonist radioligand is used. The explanation for this phenomenon is that a ternary complex consisting of agonist radioligand, receptor and G protein is formed; under this experimental condition, the equilibrium dissociation constants are underestimated, i.e., relatively high a nities are obtained (Kenakin, 1993). Thus, not only the functional models examined in the present study but also the radioligand binding experiments with [ 3 H]-N a -methylhistamine suggest that some of the ligands including FUB 373 and FUB 407 exhibit agonistic e ects at H 3 receptors.…”
Section: British Journal Of Pharmacology Vol 132 (8)mentioning
confidence: 99%