Agonists of seven-transmembrane receptors, also known as G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), do not uniformly activate all cellular signalling pathways linked to a given seven-transmembrane receptor (a phenomenon termed ligand or agonist bias); this discovery has changed how high-throughput screens are designed and how lead compounds are optimized for therapeutic activity. The ability to experimentally detect ligand bias has necessitated the development of methods for quantifying agonist bias in a way that can be used to guide structure-activity studies and the selection of drug candidates. Here, we provide a viewpoint on which methods are appropriate for quantifying bias, based on knowledge of how cellular and intracellular signalling proteins control the conformation of seven-transmembrane receptors. We also discuss possible predictions of how biased molecules may perform in vivo, and what potential therapeutic advantages they may provide.

No abstract

The cannabinoid 1 receptor (CB1R) is one of the most widely expressed metabotropic G protein-coupled receptors in brain, and its participation in various (patho)physiological processes has made CB1R activation a viable therapeutic modality. Adverse psychotropic effects limit the clinical utility of CB1R orthosteric agonists and have promoted the search for CB1R positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) with the promise of improved drug-like pharmacology and enhanced safety over typical CB1R agonists. In this study, we describe the synthesis and in vitro and ex vivo pharmacology of the novel allosteric CB1R modulator GAT211 (racemic) and its resolved enantiomers, GAT228 (R) and GAT229 (S). GAT211 engages CB1R allosteric site(s), enhances the binding of the orthosteric full agonist [H]CP55,490, and reduces the binding of the orthosteric antagonist/inverse agonist [H]SR141716A. GAT211 displayed both PAM and agonist activity in HEK293A and Neuro2a cells expressing human recombinant CB1R (hCB1R) and in mouse-brain membranes rich in native CB1R. GAT211 also exhibited a strong PAM effect in isolated vas deferens endogenously expressing CB1R. Each resolved and crystallized GAT211 enantiomer showed a markedly distinctive pharmacology as a CB1R allosteric modulator. In all biological systems examined, GAT211's allosteric agonist activity resided with the R-(+)-enantiomer (GAT228), whereas its PAM activity resided with the S-(-)-enantiomer (GAT229), which lacked intrinsic activity. These results constitute the first demonstration of enantiomer-selective CB1R positive allosteric modulation and set a precedent whereby enantiomeric resolution can decisively define the molecular pharmacology of a CB1R allosteric ligand.

Insurmountable antagonism (maximal response to the agonist depressed) can result from a temporal inequilibrium involving a slow offset orthosteric antagonist or be the result of an allosteric modulation of the receptor. The former mechanism is operative when the antagonist, agonist, and receptors cannot come to proper equilibrium during the time allotted for collection of agonist response (hemi-equilibrium conditions). Allosteric effects (changes in the conformation of the receptor through binding of the allosteric modulator to a separate site) can preclude the agonist-induced production of response, leading to depression of maximal responses. In these cases, the effects on receptor affinity can be observed as well. The first premise of this article is that system-independent estimates of insurmountable antagonist potency can be made with no prior knowledge of molecular mechanism through the use of pA 2 (Ϫlog molar concentration of antagonist producing a 2-fold shift of the concentration response curve) measurements The relationship between the pA 2 and antagonist pK B (Ϫlog equilibrium dissociation constant of the antagonist-receptor complex) is described; the former is an extremely close approximation of the latter in most cases. The second premise is that specially designed experiments are required to differentiate orthosteric versus allosteric mechanisms; simply fitting of data to orthosteric or allosteric theoretical models can lead to ambiguous results. A strategy to determine whether the observed antagonism is orthosteric (agonist and antagonist competing for the same binding site on the receptor) or allosteric in nature is described that involves the detection of the hallmarks of allosteric response, namely saturation and probe dependence of effect.Two major considerations in a drug discovery program for antagonists are the need for 1) system-independent estimates of potency and 2) knowledge of the molecular mechanism of action. The former enables systematic study of structure and activity and subsequent optimization of activity, whereas the latter allows prediction of the properties of the antagonist in the therapeutic situation. The major premise of this study is that knowledge of the mechanism of action of insurmountable antagonists is not required for the systemindependent measure of antagonist potency. In fact, verisimilitude of data to specific theoretical models is an unreliable way to determine mechanism of action (vide infra). It will be proposed that specifically designed experiments are required to do so.By definition, antagonists interfere with the ability of agonists to produce pharmacological response. The way they express this interference varies but generally involves changing the location parameter (EC 50 ; molar concentration proArticle, publication date, and citation information can be found at

The k-opioid receptor (KOR)-dynorphin system has been implicated in the control of affect, cognition, and motivation, and is thought to be dysregulated in mood and psychotic disorders, as well as in various phases of opioid dependence. KOR agonists exhibit analgesic effects, although the adverse effects produced by some KOR agonists, including sedation, dysphoria, and hallucinations, have limited their clinical use. Interestingly, KOR-mediated dysphoria, assessed in rodents as aversion, has recently been attributed to the activation of the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway following arrestin recruitment to the activated KOR. Therefore, KOR-selective G protein-biased agonists, which do not recruit arrestin, have been proposed to be more effective analgesics, without the adverse effects triggered by the arrestin pathway. As an initial step toward identifying novel biased KOR agonists, we applied a multifaceted screening strategy utilizing both in silico and parallel screening approaches. We identified several KORselective ligand scaffolds with a range of signaling bias in vitro. The arylacetamide-based scaffold includes both G protein-and b-arrestin-biased ligands, while the endogenous peptides and the diterpene scaffolds are G protein biased. Interestingly, we found scaffold screening to be more successful than library screening in identifying biased ligands. Many of the identified functionally selective ligands are potent selective KOR agonists that are reported to be active in the central nervous system. They therefore represent excellent candidates for in vivo studies aiming at determining the behavioral effects mediated by specific KORmediated signaling cascades.