2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2004.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacological dissociation of moderate and high contextual fear as assessed by freezing behavior and fear-potentiated startle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
40
1
10

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
40
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, Ray, Molnar, Aikins, Yamasaki, Newman, Castonguay et al (2009) found that patients showed a greater startle reflex than controls during tasks that induced either worry or relaxation, but not during the baseline period. In agreement with the findings of Ray et al, CC rats display potentiated startle in the conditioned context (McNish, Gewirtz, & Davis, 1997;Santos, Gargaro, Oliveira, Masson, & Brandao, 2005). It should be noted that patients suffering from other anxiety disorders with a strong anticipatory anxiety component, such as panic disorder or posttraumatic stress disorder, show elevated conditioned contextual anxiety as measured by startle, but no increase of fearpotentiated startle to a conditioned cue in comparison with healthy controls Grillon et al, 2009).…”
Section: Face Validitysupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, Ray, Molnar, Aikins, Yamasaki, Newman, Castonguay et al (2009) found that patients showed a greater startle reflex than controls during tasks that induced either worry or relaxation, but not during the baseline period. In agreement with the findings of Ray et al, CC rats display potentiated startle in the conditioned context (McNish, Gewirtz, & Davis, 1997;Santos, Gargaro, Oliveira, Masson, & Brandao, 2005). It should be noted that patients suffering from other anxiety disorders with a strong anticipatory anxiety component, such as panic disorder or posttraumatic stress disorder, show elevated conditioned contextual anxiety as measured by startle, but no increase of fearpotentiated startle to a conditioned cue in comparison with healthy controls Grillon et al, 2009).…”
Section: Face Validitysupporting
confidence: 79%
“…They are still particularly appropriate as short-term treatments, but should be used with caution, because of their risk for abuse and dependency. Treatment with a variety of benzodiazepines has been found to be effective in GAD (diazepam, alprazolam, lorazepam, clonazepam;Enkelmann, 1991;Fricchione, 2004;Rickels, DeMartinis, & Aufdembrinke, 2000), as well as in the CC model (diazepam, alprazolam, midazolam, chlordiazepoxide;Fanselow & Helmstetter, 1988;Grillon, Baas, Pine et al, 2006;Santos et al, 2005).…”
Section: Predictive Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have concluded that USVs represent a state of anxiety rather than fear, based on evidence that vocalizations are more prevalent during inter-trial intervals of fear conditioning sessions than following the onset of the CS (Jelen, Soltysik, & Zagrodzka, 2003). While amount of freezing may represent differences in intensities of the two CSs (Santos, Gárgaro, Oliveira, Masson & Brandão, 2005), it is possible that USVs are representing an alternate gradient, such as anxiety level. However, it would be surprising if rats were less anxious when presented with a CS perceived as more intense (context).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This concentration corresponds to the olfactory detection range reported for mice (10 -11 -10 -10 M) [25]. The grid floor was connected to an electronic stimulator (Grass Instruments S44, Quincy, MA, USA) coupled in series to a stimulus isolation unit (Grass Instruments SIU5, Quincy, MA, USA) and constant-current unit (Grass Instruments CCUIA, Quincy, MA, USA SIU5) that allowed the application of a total of 10 random-interval unavoidable electric footshocks (0.6 mA direct current, 1.0 s duration, 0.5 c/s) over 16 min [26,27]. One group of rats (n = 11) underwent stereotaxic surgery 24 h after the single session (24 h group).…”
Section: Experimental Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%