SUMMARY Arteriolar responses were measured on the cerebral surface of the mouse brain using an image splitter and TV monitor. The response to locally applied norepinephrine (NOR) was significantly more frequent for vessels greater than 30 M ID. than for smaller vessels. However, even the smaller vessels were frequently constricted by NOR in doses of 5 ng per milliliter. Reserpine (S mg per kilogram) failed to alter the response to NOR at either 24 or 72 hours after reserpinization. At 48 hours the threshold dose of NOR was reduced, but the effect was slight (two-tailed, P = 0.08). Both propranolol (10 6 M3 and phentolamine (10 S M) blocked responses to 5 ng per milliliter of NOR, but neither agent altered resting arteriolar diameter. Isoproterenol, tyramine, and histamine had no effect. Serotonin (SHT) constricted the arterioles but did not potentiate the response to NOR. Additive or potentiated effects were not observed with NOR, 5HT or histamine in any combination. These data indicate the presence of alpha-adrenergic receptors in murine cerebral surface arterioles, but do not establish a significant tonic effect of norepinephrine. The existence or role of a beta-receptor in these murine cerebral surface arterioles remains an unsettled question.IN 1963, we reported data concerning microcirculation on the surface of the mouse brain. That report represented an initial summary of data concerning flow patterns and pharmacological responses in this specie. 1 Since then, only one other laboratory appears to have concerned itself with the pharmacological responses of murine cerebral circulation.
"4 Meanwhile, a series of papers have appeared from our laboratory describing flow phenomena within this vascular bed of the mouse and the behavior of the vessels themselves. These papers parallel increasing reports, in other species, of the pharmacological responses of cerebral surface vessels observed in vivo and a renewal of the controversy concerning the adrenergic responses of these vessels.
5During our investigations we changed our technique of observation. This change was followed by consistent observations of contractile responses to locally applied norepinephrine (NOR) and to serotonin (5HT), where, previously, we had failed to make such observations. The new data have been presented elsewhere 6 ' 7 together with an account of the change in methodology. What remained unexplained was the reason for the new results.During the same time period, Kontos and co-workers, 8t 9 studying the cat, had also reported negative and then positive findings with respect to the response of surface arterioles or arteries to NOR. They suggested that size of the vessel was the factor determining the presence or absence of a response. The series of experiments and observations reported below was undertaken, in part, to determine whether size of the vessel played a role in our own results. In addition, we wished to repeat some other previously negative studies that had employed our older techniques, in order to determine whether these studie...