“…In order to examine EDH‐mediated relaxations, arterial rings were incubated for 40 min with N ω ‐nitro‐ l ‐arginine methyl ester ( l ‐NAME ; 10 −4 M; non‐selective inhibitor of eNOS to prevent the generation of NO; Li et al, ) and indomethacin (10 −5 M; non‐selective inhibitor of COXs to prevent the generation of vasoactive prostanoids, in particular, prostacyclin; Félétou, Huang, & Vanhoutte, ; Li et al, ). The AMPK activators, AICAR (10 −4 M) and A769662 (10 −4 M; Miglianico, Nicolaes, & Neumann, ; Salt & Hardie, ), and different pharmacological agents (to identify the signalling pathways involved) were added into the organ chambers (in addition to l ‐NAME and indomethacin) for 40 min before exposing the arterial rings to phenylephrine (10 −7 to 3 × 10 −6 M; the concentrations of phenylephrine applied during different treatments are shown in Table S2) or U46619 (3 × 10 −8 to 10 −7 M); once the contractions had stabilized, the preparations were exposed to cumulatively increasing concentrations of the following relaxing agents: ACh (10 −9 to 10 −5 M; the maximal responses to the muscarinic agonist were comparable irrespective of the concentration of phenylephrine needed to produce matched pre‐contractions during different treatments; Figure S4A) or bradykinin (10 −11 to 10 −6 M), which are gold standards for evoking endothelium‐dependent relaxations in rodent and porcine arteries, respectively (Furchgott & Zawadzki, ; Nagao & Vanhoutte, ), or SKA‐31 (10 −5 M; the concentration, within the range of 10 −9 to 10 −5 M, which caused significant relaxation in the rings [data not shown]; opener of K Ca 3.1 and K Ca 2 channels with EC 50 values of 260 nM and 2.9 μM, respectively; Sankaranarayanan et al, ).…”