2015
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacological Targeting of AMP-Activated Protein Kinase and Opportunities for Computer-Aided Drug Design

Abstract: As a central regulator of metabolism, the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is an established therapeutic target for metabolic diseases. Beyond the metabolic area, the number of medical fields that involve AMPK grows continuously, expanding the potential applications for AMPK modulators. Even though indirect AMPK activators are used in the clinics for their beneficial metabolic outcome, the few described direct agonists all failed to reach the market to date, which leaves options open for novel targeting met… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present observations are in line with earlier suggestions that A769662 has a more pronounced effect in vascular smooth muscle in which AICAR seems to be ineffective compared to its action in other tissues (Rubin et al, 2005;Schneider et al, 2015). A769662 and AICAR bind to different sites of AMPK (the former is a β1-selective activator, while the active metabolite of the latter binds to the γ-subunit, resulting in exposure of the kinase domain in the α-subunit; Miglianico et al, 2015;Salt & Hardie, 2017); however, the absence of a different distribution of enzyme subunits in the present preparations with and without endothelium cannot explain the divergent actions of the two activators, although the anatomically smaller number of endothelial cells in the intima compared to the larger amount of vascular smooth muscle makes the interpretation difficult.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present observations are in line with earlier suggestions that A769662 has a more pronounced effect in vascular smooth muscle in which AICAR seems to be ineffective compared to its action in other tissues (Rubin et al, 2005;Schneider et al, 2015). A769662 and AICAR bind to different sites of AMPK (the former is a β1-selective activator, while the active metabolite of the latter binds to the γ-subunit, resulting in exposure of the kinase domain in the α-subunit; Miglianico et al, 2015;Salt & Hardie, 2017); however, the absence of a different distribution of enzyme subunits in the present preparations with and without endothelium cannot explain the divergent actions of the two activators, although the anatomically smaller number of endothelial cells in the intima compared to the larger amount of vascular smooth muscle makes the interpretation difficult.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In order to examine EDH‐mediated relaxations, arterial rings were incubated for 40 min with N ω ‐nitro‐ l ‐arginine methyl ester ( l ‐NAME ; 10 −4 M; non‐selective inhibitor of eNOS to prevent the generation of NO; Li et al, ) and indomethacin (10 −5 M; non‐selective inhibitor of COXs to prevent the generation of vasoactive prostanoids, in particular, prostacyclin; Félétou, Huang, & Vanhoutte, ; Li et al, ). The AMPK activators, AICAR (10 −4 M) and A769662 (10 −4 M; Miglianico, Nicolaes, & Neumann, ; Salt & Hardie, ), and different pharmacological agents (to identify the signalling pathways involved) were added into the organ chambers (in addition to l ‐NAME and indomethacin) for 40 min before exposing the arterial rings to phenylephrine (10 −7 to 3 × 10 −6 M; the concentrations of phenylephrine applied during different treatments are shown in Table S2) or U46619 (3 × 10 −8 to 10 −7 M); once the contractions had stabilized, the preparations were exposed to cumulatively increasing concentrations of the following relaxing agents: ACh (10 −9 to 10 −5 M; the maximal responses to the muscarinic agonist were comparable irrespective of the concentration of phenylephrine needed to produce matched pre‐contractions during different treatments; Figure S4A) or bradykinin (10 −11 to 10 −6 M), which are gold standards for evoking endothelium‐dependent relaxations in rodent and porcine arteries, respectively (Furchgott & Zawadzki, ; Nagao & Vanhoutte, ), or SKA‐31 (10 −5 M; the concentration, within the range of 10 −9 to 10 −5 M, which caused significant relaxation in the rings [data not shown]; opener of K Ca 3.1 and K Ca 2 channels with EC 50 values of 260 nM and 2.9 μM, respectively; Sankaranarayanan et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the major importance of AMPK in body energy homeostasis, this enzyme has drawn the attention of many researchers as a suitable candidate for the treatment of several metabolic diseases [7]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The β subunit serves as a scaffold to bridge α and γ subunits that contains a glycogen binding domain (GBD) and a C-terminal domain [ 10 ]. The γ subunit is composed of a β subunit-binding region and two Bateman domains [ 11 ]. These seven subunits (α1, α2, β1, β2, γ1, γ2, and γ3) are encoded by separate genes, resulting in 12 different αβγ AMPK heterotrimers [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%