Americans per year, with an overall mortality rate of approximately 40%. The objective of this article is to provide a review of these disease states, with an emphasis on a working definition, epidemiology, pathogenesis, and latest treatment advances. Where applicable, we will also discuss the implications of therapies for ALI for acid-base, volume status, and azotemia, metabolic parameters that are frequent concerns for the nephrologist.
DefinitionsALI and ARDS are clinical syndromes characterized by the acute onset (less than 7 d) of severe hypoxemia and bilateral pulmonary infiltrates in the absence of clinical evidence for left atrial hypertension (reviewed in (1,2)). The severity of the hypoxemia differentiates ALI from ARDS. The American/European Consensus Conference defined patients with ALI as those who have a ratio of partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (Pao 2 ) to the inspired fraction of oxygen (Fio 2 ) of less than 300 and patients with ARDS as those with a Pao 2 /Fio 2 of less than 200 (3). Both ALI and ARDS develop in association with a wide variety of clinical disorders, including sepsis, pneumonia, aspiration, and major trauma, including severe burns. ALI and ARDS can also occur as sequelae of acute pancreatitis, smoke or toxic gas inhalation, massive blood transfusion, or a reaction to a single blood product transfusion (also known as transfusionassociated lung injury).Importantly, the Consensus Conference definition has been critical for identifying patients who are appropriate for clinical trials and has also provided standardization that allows for comparison of patients across studies. We believe that standardization of definitions for ALI/ARDS has contributed importantly to the advancement of the field and the observed improved survival of subjects with these conditions. For example, in the first ARDS Network clinical trial (4), overall survival of study subjects was 35.4%, compared with 26.8% in the recently completed Fluid and Catheter Treatment Trial (FACTT) trial (5), despite the fact that individuals enrolled in FACTT had higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III scores. Similarly, a consensus definition has allowed for comparison of study results across the spectrum of sepsis and septic shock. The recently proposed Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End Stage Renal Disease) criteria (6) for acute kidney injury or the even more recent Acute Kidney Injury Network modification (7) will hopefully allow for standardization across studies of acute kidney injury Published online ahead of print. Publication date available at www.cjasn.org.