Most patients with sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome (SAHS) are middle-aged men. As there are conflicting data on the effects of age and gender on upper airway calibre, we tested the hypothesis that increasing age and the male sex predispose to upper airway narrowing in normal subjects.We measured upper airway calibre using acoustic reflection in 60 men and 54 women (median 35, range 16-74 yrs) both seated and supine.All upper airway dimensions, except oropharyngeal junction (OPJ), decreased with increasing age in both men and women (r>-0.24, p≤0.05) while supine (r 2 >0.06). Men had greater changes in airway area at OPJ on lying down (mean (SEM) 0.5 (0.1), 0.2 (0.1) cm 2 ; p<0.02). Men had greater body mass indices (mean (SD) 26 (4), 24 (4) kg·m -2 ; p=0.04), and larger neck circumferences (mean (SD) 38 (3), 33 (2) cm; p<0.0001) than women. For any body mass index, neck circumference was larger in men than women (p<0.001).This study shows that upper airway size decreases with increasing age in both men and women, and that men have greater upper airway collapsibility on lying down at oropharyngeal junction than women. Eur Respir J 1997; 10: 2087-2090 The effects of age and gender on upper airway calibre are unclear. Clarification of their influences is important because the clinical condition associated with upper airway narrowing, the sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome (SAHS), is predominantly a condition of middle-aged men [1]. BROOKS and STROHL [2] reported men to have larger upper airway calibre than women when seated and awake. Studies performed in the sitting position have indicated that upper airways resistance increases, and pharyngeal area decreases [3] with age in men but not in women. In contrast, computed tomography (CT) scan studies in supine men have shown no age-related increase in upper airway collapsibility in men [4]. In order to clarify this, we tested the hypothesis that increasing age and the male sex predispose to upper airway narrowing in the normal population.
Methods
SubjectsWe aimed to select a cross section of the local population and therefore recruited 60 male and 54 female subjects from the hospital workforce using an advertisement that did not refer to sleep. Their height, weight and neck circumference at the cricothyroid membrane were measured (table 1). Subjects were asked whether they snored and in which position, and whether they suffered from uncontrollable daytime sleepiness. Responses were noted but no one was excluded from the analysis as this was a population-based study. However, subjects with gross retrognathia were assessed clinically and excluded from the analysis. The study was approved by the local Ethics Advisory Committee.