2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2016.07.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PHASE: A geostatistical model for the Kriging-based spatial prediction of crop phenology using public phenological and climatological observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interpolated phenological maps indicated a coherent spatial distribution of the interpolated phenological DOYs from prespring to full autumn across the Bavaria region and its elevational gradients. Comparable spatial differences were modeled by Gerstmann et al (2016) for shooting (DOYs 100-130) and yellow ripening (DOYs 180-220) of winter wheat across Germany where these Kriging-interpolated phenological phases also showed delays of plant development in mountainous and coastal regions. Since the interpolation method applied uses regression coefficients from multiple linear regression models which most importantly account for the elevation, this spatial difference proves to be reasonable.…”
Section: Spatial Variability In Map Interpolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The interpolated phenological maps indicated a coherent spatial distribution of the interpolated phenological DOYs from prespring to full autumn across the Bavaria region and its elevational gradients. Comparable spatial differences were modeled by Gerstmann et al (2016) for shooting (DOYs 100-130) and yellow ripening (DOYs 180-220) of winter wheat across Germany where these Kriging-interpolated phenological phases also showed delays of plant development in mountainous and coastal regions. Since the interpolation method applied uses regression coefficients from multiple linear regression models which most importantly account for the elevation, this spatial difference proves to be reasonable.…”
Section: Spatial Variability In Map Interpolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Except for late summer (n = 652/135) and full autumn (n = 613/103), there are throughout 800-1000 phenological observations in Germany and 160-200 in Bavaria for spatial interpolation, respectively. Besides, a lack of phenological data for regions above 1000 m is also critical for the uncertainty assessment since interpolation in mountainous regions was evaluated to be associated with high uncertainty according to Gerstmann et al (2016).…”
Section: Spatial Variability In Map Interpolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To match the spatial resolution of other environmental factors, DEM was resampled to 1 km for the extraction of plan and profile curvatures. The resolution of the underlying DEM suppressed small-scale variations in elevation, thereby reducing the accuracies of morphometric parameters (Gerstmann, Doktor, Gläßer, & Möller, 2016). Grohmann (2015) pointed out that morphometric parameters get smaller when derived by lower resampling of DEM.…”
Section: Uncertainty Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PM derived information has a large potential for different environmental applications such tacking the rhythm of seasons (Morisette et al, 2009), estimating carbon sequestration potential of forests (Leinonen and Kramer, 2002), agriculture and natural resource management (Schwartz et al, 2013;Gerstmann et al, 2016;Nissanka et al, 2017). Moreover, phenological model outputs are used to reconstruct and qualify ground- (Chuine et al, 2004;Menzel, 2005) and satellite-based Macbean et al, 2015) time-series of VPOs, and to estimate species-specific phenology (Krinner et al, 2005;Chuine et al, 2013).…”
Section: Phenological Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%