Phase Behavior and Molecular Thermodynamics of Coacervation in Oppositely Charged Polyelectrolyte/Surfactant Systems: A Cationic Polymer JR 400 and Anionic Surfactant SDS Mixture

Abstract

Coacervation in mixtures of polyelectrolytes and surfactants with opposite charge is common in nature and is also technologically important to consumer health care products. To understand the complexation behavior of these systems better, we combine multiple experimental techniques to systematically study the polymer/surfactant binding interactions and the phase behavior of anionic sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) surfactant in cationic JR 400 polymer aqueous solutions. The phase-behavior study resolves a discrepancy in the literature by identifying a metastable phase between the differing redissolution phase boundaries reported in the literature for the surfactant-rich regime. Isothermal titration calorimetry analyzed within the framework of the simple Satake-Yang model identifies binding parameters for the surfactant-lean phase, whereas a calculation for polymer-bound micelles coexisting with free micelles is analyzed in the surfactant-rich redissolution regime. This analysis provides a preliminary understanding of the interactions governing the observed phase behavior. The resulting thermodynamic properties, including binding constants and the molar Gibbs free energies, enthalpies, and entropies, identify the relative importance of both hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions and provide a first approximation for the corresponding microstructures in the different phases. Our study also addresses the stability and metastability of oppositely charged polyelectrolytes and surfactant mixtures.

Complexes of oppositely charged polyelectrolytes and surfactants – recent developments in the field of biologically derived polyelectrolytes

“…This redissolution is attributed to the formation of mixed aggregates stabilized by polyelectrolyte bound surfactant micelles. 44 …”

Controlling the Morphology of Organic Crystals with Filamentous Bacteriophages

“…47−49 There are two types of adsorption sites in this model: cooperative binding, where the neighboring site is occupied by another surfactant, and noncooperative adsorption, where the adjacent site is vacant. 50 The average site coverage, θ, is the ratio of the occupied sites to all possible binding sites. By interpretation of the average coverage θ in terms of experimentally measurable quantities, such as the free surfactant concentration (C s ), the binding isotherm is 48…”

“…52 Therefore, it is about approximately 13 times more likely for phage to bind adjacent to each other than away from each other, implying a high chance of phage−phage interactions. 50 …”

Co-assembly in chitosan–surfactant mixtures: thermodynamics, structures, interfacial properties and applications

“…In a simplified but still realistic picture, the interactions between surfactant and polymer can be divided into "vertical" and "horizontal" forces: the former between surfactant and polymer, they are mostly of electrostatic nature but also hydrophobic forces and hydrogen bonding play a role; the latter consider the interaction among the surfactant tails, mostly by hydrophobic and dispersion forces. For binding processes following the Satake-Yang isotherm, which is often the case for semi-rigid polysaccharide/surfactant mixtures [38][39][40][41], a detailed calorimetric investigation can highlight the relevance of the different energetic contributions [42]. The outcome of a typical isothermal calorimetric titration for oppositely charged surfactant/ polyelectrolyte mixtures is reported in Fig.…”