2018
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2018.2841837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase Calibration of an Along-Track Interferometric FMCW SAR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the phase information is also target-dependent, the influence of the phase noise is not critical for imaging applications with complicated targets such as GPR and near-range MMW imaging [19] [39]. The polluted IF signal with phase noise usually results in reduced imaging resolution and imaging artifacts [44]. Meanwhile, phase information becomes essential for advanced radar techniques such as polarization analysis.…”
Section: Appendix A: Phase Noise In If Signal and Imaging Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the phase information is also target-dependent, the influence of the phase noise is not critical for imaging applications with complicated targets such as GPR and near-range MMW imaging [19] [39]. The polluted IF signal with phase noise usually results in reduced imaging resolution and imaging artifacts [44]. Meanwhile, phase information becomes essential for advanced radar techniques such as polarization analysis.…”
Section: Appendix A: Phase Noise In If Signal and Imaging Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, observations with different polarization properties and phase calibration are required [45]. In the future, phase calibration will also be introduced to the proposed system to enhance the imaging resolution and/or to obtain doppler information [28] [44].…”
Section: Appendix A: Phase Noise In If Signal and Imaging Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The residual error in the normalization is smaller than 1 dB stdev. The speckle noise [35] was nearly removed by averaging single looks at ∼ 7 m resolution over each field (∼ 800 m × 800 m). The measured backscattering coefficients are compared with the outputs from the data-cubes and also serve as the inputs for the time-series retrieval of the soil moisture, which will be illustrated in the later sections.…”
Section: Smapvex12 Campaignmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The position (x, y, z) of the point target referenced to the scanning geometry can be estimated by applying the least squares curve fitting approaches [73] to the measured beat signal phase. These approaches directly result in an estimate of the target position by finding the set of parameters, which minimizes the squared error between the modeled and measured phase as {x,ŷ,ẑ} = arg max…”
Section: Mimo Array Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%