2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00190-009-0333-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase center modeling for LEO GPS receiver antennas and its impact on precise orbit determination

Abstract: Most satellites in a low-Earth orbit (LEO) with demanding requirements on precise orbit determination (POD) are equipped with on-board receivers to collect the observations from Global Navigation Satellite systems (GNSS), such as the Global Positioning System (GPS). Limiting factors for LEO POD are nowadays mainly encountered with the modeling of the carrier phase observations, where a precise knowledge of the phase center location of the GNSS antennas is a prerequisite for high-precision orbit analyses. Since… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
100
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
100
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Luthcke et al (2003) and Haines et al (2004) used post-fit phase residuals to develop an empirical PCV map for Jason-1. Furthermore, Jäggi et al (2009) also calibrated phase center variations for GRACE mission by both residual approach and direct approach.…”
Section: Gps Antenna Phase Center Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Luthcke et al (2003) and Haines et al (2004) used post-fit phase residuals to develop an empirical PCV map for Jason-1. Furthermore, Jäggi et al (2009) also calibrated phase center variations for GRACE mission by both residual approach and direct approach.…”
Section: Gps Antenna Phase Center Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 lists the coordinates for the center of the mounting plane (CMP) of the SSTI-A antenna in the SRF. Jäggi et al (2009) showed that neglected or mismodeled antenna phase center offsets (PCOs) and variations (PCVs) are important systematic error sources in GPS data processing of LEO satellites. Table 3 summarizes the PCO values for the two GPS frequencies in the antenna reference frame (ARF).…”
Section: General Information About Goce Gps Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The requirement in latency is 2 weeks with an accuracy of 2 cm (1D, Visser et al 2006). The two institutions have proven their ability for LEO POD in, e.g., Jäggi et al (2007Jäggi et al ( , 2009van den IJssel et al (2003); Montenbruck et al (2005Montenbruck et al ( , 2008 and have shown in Bock et al (2007) and Visser et al (2009) that the POD requirements for the GOCE mission can be met with their procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GOCE satellite was equipped, among others, with two 12-channel dual-frequency Lagrange GPS hl-SST instruments (Intelisano et al 2008), each consisting of a geodetic-quality GPS receiver and a helix antenna. In this study, GPS data collected in the nominal phase of the GOCE mission spanning the time interval from November 2009 to July 2012 are used and the days with data problems are excluded as proposed in (Visser et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%