2018
DOI: 10.1587/elex.15.20180175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase difference analysis technique for parametric faults BIST in CMOS analog circuits

Abstract: Detection of parametric faults is a crucial issue due to the large variation of the fabrication process, which provide a range of acceptable parameter deviations in analog circuits. This paper presents a phase difference analysis technique, which is sensitive to the parametric deviations and allows a tolerance band of passive analog components. Test operations can be simply achieved by comparing the phase difference between a reference clock signal and a reconfigured circuit-under-test (CUT) as an oscillator. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section we present extensive transistor-level simulation results validating the proposed op amp defect detection and localization technique using two circuits: a twostage folded cascode amplifier and a two-stage telescopic op amp. Multiple op amp defect detection techniques [20,29,37,38] presented in literature are tested against the simple five-transistor differential amplifier followed by a common source (CS) stage and as such do not include cascode transistors which are common in several high-performance op amp topologies [39][40]. As a result, we chose these op amp topologies to validate our method.…”
Section: Defect Simulations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we present extensive transistor-level simulation results validating the proposed op amp defect detection and localization technique using two circuits: a twostage folded cascode amplifier and a two-stage telescopic op amp. Multiple op amp defect detection techniques [20,29,37,38] presented in literature are tested against the simple five-transistor differential amplifier followed by a common source (CS) stage and as such do not include cascode transistors which are common in several high-performance op amp topologies [39][40]. As a result, we chose these op amp topologies to validate our method.…”
Section: Defect Simulations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach of the OBIST system is to compare a fault-free circuit to a faulty circuit, and the difference of the counted pulses can be estimated, highlighting the level of parametric faults in the CUT [9]. Similarly to the OBIST system presented in Reference [9], a phase shift between fault-free and faulty circuits could be estimated [35]. In the case of catastrophic fault detection, an on-chip Schmitt oscillator could be used as a reference signal for counting CUT pulses, but such approach cannot be used for the detection of parametric faults [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%