2023
DOI: 10.3390/electronics12020416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase Diffusion in Low-EJ Josephson Junctions at Milli-Kelvin Temperatures

Abstract: Josephson junctions (JJs) with Josephson energy EJ≲1 K are widely employed as non-linear elements in superconducting circuits for quantum computing operating at milli-Kelvin temperatures. In the qubits with small charging energy EC ( EJ/EC≫1 ), such as the transmon, the incoherent phase slips (IPS) might become the dominant source of dissipation with decreasing EJ. In this work, a systematic study of the IPS in low-EJ JJs at milli-Kelvin temperatures is reported. Strong suppression of the critical (switching) … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 b, c are the theoretical results obtained by the standard P(E) theory 12 under the condition E J ≪ k B T in an RC -environment, which highlights the effect of the electromagnetic environment on Josephson phase fluctuations (see Supplementary Note 4 ). Despite the fact that the condition E J ≪ k B T is not well satisfied for either of the two samples, one can use a simple rule: if the Josephson energy E J is less than Josephson energy obtained from Ambegaokar-Baratoff (which is our case), then P ( E ) theory should still hold regardless of the condition E J ≪ k B T and the relatives’ magnitudes of E J and E C 36 . In these calculations, we include overheating caused by the applied bias, as depicted in the inset of Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…2 b, c are the theoretical results obtained by the standard P(E) theory 12 under the condition E J ≪ k B T in an RC -environment, which highlights the effect of the electromagnetic environment on Josephson phase fluctuations (see Supplementary Note 4 ). Despite the fact that the condition E J ≪ k B T is not well satisfied for either of the two samples, one can use a simple rule: if the Josephson energy E J is less than Josephson energy obtained from Ambegaokar-Baratoff (which is our case), then P ( E ) theory should still hold regardless of the condition E J ≪ k B T and the relatives’ magnitudes of E J and E C 36 . In these calculations, we include overheating caused by the applied bias, as depicted in the inset of Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%