2015
DOI: 10.1117/1.oe.54.6.064103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase error analysis and reduction in phase measuring deflectometry

Abstract: In phase measuring deflectometry (PMD), the inspection accuracy of the defects and height of the specular surface are related to the level of phase errors. The usage of numeric integration in reconstructing the shape and the defocusing capture of the fringe pattern, which will amplify the phase errors, make error discussion more significant in PMD than other shape measurement techniques. Phase error analysis and reduction in PMD are presented. The random noises, nonlinear response function, the nontelecentric … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Especially, the classical PMD will amplify the phase errors because the shape data are reconstructed by slope integration and the captured fringe pattern is defocused. Phase error sources mainly arise from the random noise, nonlinear response function, the non-telecentric imaging of the CCD camera, and the nonlinear response function of the LCD screen [ 114 ].…”
Section: Influential Factors On Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially, the classical PMD will amplify the phase errors because the shape data are reconstructed by slope integration and the captured fringe pattern is defocused. Phase error sources mainly arise from the random noise, nonlinear response function, the non-telecentric imaging of the CCD camera, and the nonlinear response function of the LCD screen [ 114 ].…”
Section: Influential Factors On Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each fringe image from the LCD screen (LILLIPUT, 9.7 , 1024 × 768 pixels, 192 µm pixel size, Lenovo, Beijing, China) was captured by the CCD camera (Blackfly 2.3 MP Mono GigE PoE, 1920 × 1200 pixels, 5 µm pixel spacing, Point Grey, Vancouver, BC, Canada) four times repeatedly, and the surface shape of the mirror under test was reconstructed based on the algorithm [36,37]. During experiment, the acquisition noise could be reduced by averaging the captured images of the repeated measurements [38] and filtering out with an appropriate filtering window in the Fourier transform process [39].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…camera (Blackfly 2.3 MP Mono GigE PoE, 1920 × 1200 pixels, 5 μm pixel spacing, Point Grey, Vancouver, Canada) four times repeatedly, and the surface shape of the mirror under test was reconstructed based on the algorithm [36,37]. During experiment, the acquisition noise could be reduced by averaging the captured images of the repeated measurements [38] and filtering out with an appropriate filtering window in the Fourier transform process [39]. In the experiment, the PMD method, a widely verified surface shape measurement method, was set as the comparison to verify the validity and flexibility of the proposed COPMD method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al [13] proposed a phase averaging method with the temporal phase unwrapping algorithm to compensate for the random errors in phase retrieval. Wu et al [14] analyzed the random noise of the defocused fringe patterns and CCD camera in deflectometry and proposed a phase error compensation method. However, all the above methods can only compensate for the phase errors of each factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%