2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2010.09.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase evolution during the low temperature formation of stoichiometric hydroxyapatite-gypsum composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on these findings, it could be concluded that the previously observed delay in the growth kinetics of gypsum was attributed to the decrease in the pH of the medium to values below those obtained during the hydration of POP and its conversion to gypsum. A similar trend was previously observed in composite mixtures containing synthetic stoichiometric HAp (S-SH) and gypsum precursors, where a buffering effect was observed as a result of the slower dissolution of the S-SH powders into these solutions [23]. Release of calcium and phosphate ions from the relatively more soluble S-CH, compared to S-SH, is therefore considered the main cause of the delay of the growth kinetics of gypsum in the current system.…”
Section: Ph Measurementssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Based on these findings, it could be concluded that the previously observed delay in the growth kinetics of gypsum was attributed to the decrease in the pH of the medium to values below those obtained during the hydration of POP and its conversion to gypsum. A similar trend was previously observed in composite mixtures containing synthetic stoichiometric HAp (S-SH) and gypsum precursors, where a buffering effect was observed as a result of the slower dissolution of the S-SH powders into these solutions [23]. Release of calcium and phosphate ions from the relatively more soluble S-CH, compared to S-SH, is therefore considered the main cause of the delay of the growth kinetics of gypsum in the current system.…”
Section: Ph Measurementssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…5, in contrast to a maximum of 10.8 after 6 h with SHAp precursors. This could be attributed to the presence of lower concentration of TetCP in the CDS precursors' mixture, compared to that in the SHAp precursors' mixture [23]. This was followed by a decrease in the solution pH achieving a value of 9.1 after 24 h; marked as area IV in Fig.…”
Section: Ph Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…a binder for building material, bone graft materials, periodontal disease treatment, endodontic lesions, alveolar bone loss, maxillary sinus augmentation, filler for plastic, rubber, coating, and construction materials, desiccant, coagulant, and catalysts [1,2,3]. In general, calcium sulfate compounds in the form of γ-or β-anhydrite (the nearly anhydrous) namely anhydrous calcium sulfate, calcium sulfate hemihydrate or plaster of Paris, and gypsum (CaSO 4 .2H 2 O) are the most abundant sulfate mineral in nature [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%