2010
DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyq077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase I/II Trial of Concurrent Use of S-1 and Radiation Therapy for T2 Glottic Cancer

Abstract: The use of S-1 at 80 mg/m(2) per day in a split-course with 1-week rest during the course of radiation therapy was safe and effective for Stage II glottic cancer. The treatment strategy employing orally available S-1 proved to be beneficial over the conventional injection of antitumor agents for maintaining the patients' quality of life.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To improve the LCR with primary RT and to minimize the need for salvage surgery, clinicians have performed CCRT for Stage II SCC of the glottic larynx, and retrospective reports have found it to be effective (32 -36). Although there has been a prospective examination of CCRT for Stage II SCC of the glottic larynx as a Phase II study, the sample size was not calculated to evaluate the LCR (25). Therefore, the present Phase II study of CCRT with S-1 was performed in patients with Stage II SCC of the pharynx or larynx with LCR as the primary endpoint.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve the LCR with primary RT and to minimize the need for salvage surgery, clinicians have performed CCRT for Stage II SCC of the glottic larynx, and retrospective reports have found it to be effective (32 -36). Although there has been a prospective examination of CCRT for Stage II SCC of the glottic larynx as a Phase II study, the sample size was not calculated to evaluate the LCR (25). Therefore, the present Phase II study of CCRT with S-1 was performed in patients with Stage II SCC of the pharynx or larynx with LCR as the primary endpoint.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference from our study is that their total radiation dose was only 40 Gy because they were giving preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy. There have been other reports on Phase III trials of radiotherapy with S-1 [19][20][21][22][23] or the combination of S-1 and cisplatin/nedaplatin [24][25][26] for head and neck cancer. These studies have demonstrated that S-1 and concurrent radical radiotherapy is safe and well tolerated by patients with complications and is a patient-friendly treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Phase III, randomized trial, 60 Gy-based CCRT (experimental arm) revealed comparative effects on larynx preservation and survival over a 70 Gy-based CCRT (control arm) (18). Even though 70 Gy is the standard adopted RT dose today, we have reported a favorable oncologic outcome with 60 Gy-based S1RT in T2 glottic cancers (19); the present study, including extended phase II S1RT analysis, reconfirmed the effectiveness of our S1RT regimen. Reports from other institutes have also advocated CCRT over RT in early laryngeal cancers (20,21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Reports from other institutes have also advocated CCRT over RT in early laryngeal cancers (20,21). We preferred to use 5-FU derivatives because (i) an orally available agent combined with 60 Gy RT enables most of the patients to be treated at an outpatient setting, (ii) the regimen has demonstrated satisfactory treatment effect with limited toxicities (19) and (iii) most of the patients maintained good quality of life. However, considering the intermediate follow-up duration of S1RT regimen, continuing efforts must be paid to detect the occurrence of late adverse events.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%