1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf01275484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase II evaluation of didemnin B in advanced adenocarcinoma of the kidney

Abstract: The Southwest Oncology Group studied the response rate and toxicity of didemnin B (3.47 mg/m2 i.v. q 28 days) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. There were no responses in 22 response evaluable patients. Toxicity was significant with 10 patients having grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Toxicity seen included nausea and vomiting, exacerbation of coronary artery disease, hyperglycemia, anorexia, diarrhea and hepatitis. Didemnin B was toxic but inactive in patients with renal cell treated at this dose.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cremophorcontaining solution that Didemnin B is administered in has been suggested as a possible causative factor for allergic reactions rather than the drug itself [2]. Taylor et al [4] have reported 0/22 response to Didemnin B in patients with renal cell cancer and 3 acute drug reactions. The observed toxicity of anaphylaxis warrents caution for consideration of clinical trials with Didemnin B for other malignancies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The cremophorcontaining solution that Didemnin B is administered in has been suggested as a possible causative factor for allergic reactions rather than the drug itself [2]. Taylor et al [4] have reported 0/22 response to Didemnin B in patients with renal cell cancer and 3 acute drug reactions. The observed toxicity of anaphylaxis warrents caution for consideration of clinical trials with Didemnin B for other malignancies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As general protein synthesis inhibitors have not proven useful as cancer therapeutics, it is highly unlikely that the effects of CGs on protein synthesis can be successfully exploited to treat cancer [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30]. Furthermore, the narrow therapeutic window of CGs indicates that the serum levels required to achieve protein synthesis inhibition could cause intoxication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this unbiased approach we unexpectedly discovered that CGs are potent general protein synthesis inhibitors in a variety of normal and transformed human cells. Whereas drugs such as sirolimus (rapamycin) that inhibit the translation of a specific subset of mRNAs are now used to treat certain neoplasms, the general protein synthesis inhibitors have proven to be very toxic and not useful in the treatment of cancer [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30]. Therefore, our findings have direct implications for the validity of CGs as promising cancer drugs and discourage further clinical testing of cardiac glycosides or their derivatives as anti-cancer agents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One partial response was achieved (5%) in 21 patients [193]. Some phase II clinical trials were also undertaken by other groups [122,[195][196][197][198][199][200][201][202][203]. From the data analysis, didemnin B 176 is not recommended in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma.…”
Section: [132]mentioning
confidence: 99%