2019
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase II study of high-sensitivity genotyping of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA to ultra-select metastatic colorectal cancer patients for panitumumab plus FOLFIRI: the ULTRA trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…were not associated with worse outcomes, further corroborating the current clinical use of validated assays with 5% limit of detection for RAS testing in tumor tissue. 23 On the other side, mutations detected thanks to ctDNA genotyping may mirror the presence of clinically important tumor subclones and could be associated with the rapid emergence of acquired resistance rather than primary resistance to anti-EGFRs. In attempt to further characterize this phenomenon, we showed that patients with RAS and/or PIK3CA VAF >5% in cfDNA have the worst PFS and OS, while patients with RAS VAF >5% also showed worse dynamics of response including ETS and DoR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…were not associated with worse outcomes, further corroborating the current clinical use of validated assays with 5% limit of detection for RAS testing in tumor tissue. 23 On the other side, mutations detected thanks to ctDNA genotyping may mirror the presence of clinically important tumor subclones and could be associated with the rapid emergence of acquired resistance rather than primary resistance to anti-EGFRs. In attempt to further characterize this phenomenon, we showed that patients with RAS and/or PIK3CA VAF >5% in cfDNA have the worst PFS and OS, while patients with RAS VAF >5% also showed worse dynamics of response including ETS and DoR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major point of discussion is whether the optimal threshold of the RAS mutant allele fraction to identify patients likely to benefit from anti-EGFR drugs should be 1% or 5%. We used a threshold of 5% as it has been reported that reducing the threshold to 1% does not improve outcomes [ 36 , 37 ]. We found one sensitive patient (P28) who harbored the A146V KRAS mutation at 5%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of note, focusing on the issue of analytical sensitivity in evaluating predictive biomarkers to anti-EGFR treatments, the phase II ULTRA trial investigated a high-sensitivity tumor tissue genotyping technique of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA to ultra-select irinotecan-resistant mCRC patients for panitumumab plus FOLFIRI treatment. Results from this study identify the optimal RAS/BRAF mutational threshold for outcome prediction to be 5%, suggesting that the biological and clinical implications of mutation frequencies below this cut-off still warrant further investigations 79…”
Section: Novel Mechanisms Of Resistance and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 91%