2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase relations and linear thermal expansion of cubic solid solutions in the Th1−xMxO2−x/2 (M=Eu, Gd, Dy) systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These calculated values agree with the experimental data of Kim et al 7) very well, while the agreement with the experimental data of Mathews et al 32) is somewhat worse. The reason for the difference in agreement is attributable to the difference in sample preparation conditions for the two experimental studies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These calculated values agree with the experimental data of Kim et al 7) very well, while the agreement with the experimental data of Mathews et al 32) is somewhat worse. The reason for the difference in agreement is attributable to the difference in sample preparation conditions for the two experimental studies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The diffusion coefficients of O ions were calculated at 1273 K. Figure 2 shows lattice parameter changes of the Gd-doped thoria as a function of Gd fraction. The experimental lattice parameter values 7,32) decrease with Gd fraction, as shown in the figure. Details of these lattice parameter changes are discussed later.…”
Section: Simulation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the much higher melting point of ThO 2 (3390°C) compared to that of UO 2 (2827°C), and the fact that metal diffusion speeds are lower in ThO 2 [49], one can expect that higher sintering temperatures or different sintering techniques are necessary to obtain a comparable density and homogeneity in gadolinium concentration. Indeed, the powder metallurgical route applied by Mathews et al [42] uses several heating (at different temperatures and very prolonged sintering times of 36-48 h) and regrinding steps to obtain single-phased samples. Muta et al [15] also used multiple grinding and sintering steps and in addition, the final sintering was performed via spark plasma sintering under pressure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the specific case of Gd 2 O 3 -doped UO 2 production, powder metallurgical routes were described by Grossman et al [32], Yuda and Une [33], and Riella et al [34], coprecipitation processes by Manzel and Dörr [35], Fukushima et al [36], Miyake et al [37], Riella et al [34], Leyva et al [38], and Durazzo et al [39], and sol gel routes by Gündüz et al [40,41]. For the synthesis of Gd 2 O 3 -doped ThO 2 , powder metallurgical routes were described by Mathews et al [42] and Muta et al [15], and co-precipitation processes by Horlait et al [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%