2016
DOI: 10.1063/1.4953471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase response curves for models of earthquake fault dynamics

Abstract: We systematically study effects of external perturbations on models describing earthquake fault dynamics. The latter are based on the framework of the Burridge-Knopoff spring-block system, including the cases of a simple mono-block fault, as well as the paradigmatic complex faults made up of two identical or distinct blocks. The blocks exhibit relaxation oscillations, which are representative for the stick-slip behavior typical for earthquake dynamics. Our analysis is carried out by determining the phase respo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(99 reference statements)
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is similar to the simulation results with the periodical earthquake occurrences obtained by some authors (e.g., Rice and Tse, 1986;Ryabov and Ito, 2001;Erickson et al, 2008;Mitsui and Hirahara, 2009) based on the one-body model with rate-and statedependent friction or velocity-weakening friction. However, the present result is inconsistent with the simulation results, from which either the time-predictable model or the slippredictable model cannot interpret the temporal variation in cumulative slip, based on the same model obtained by others (e.g., He et al, 2003;Bazzarri, 2012b;Bizzarri and Crupi, 2014;Kostić et al, 2013a, b;Franović et al, 2016). The differences between the two groups of researchers might be due to distinct additional constrains in respective studies.…”
Section: Simulation Resultscontrasting
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is similar to the simulation results with the periodical earthquake occurrences obtained by some authors (e.g., Rice and Tse, 1986;Ryabov and Ito, 2001;Erickson et al, 2008;Mitsui and Hirahara, 2009) based on the one-body model with rate-and statedependent friction or velocity-weakening friction. However, the present result is inconsistent with the simulation results, from which either the time-predictable model or the slippredictable model cannot interpret the temporal variation in cumulative slip, based on the same model obtained by others (e.g., He et al, 2003;Bazzarri, 2012b;Bizzarri and Crupi, 2014;Kostić et al, 2013a, b;Franović et al, 2016). The differences between the two groups of researchers might be due to distinct additional constrains in respective studies.…”
Section: Simulation Resultscontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…Figures 4-7 show that when U c and η are constants during the computational time periods, the general patterns of temporal variations in cumulated slip do not change. Some of the previous studies (e.g., Bizzarri, 2012a, b;Franović et al, 2016) suggest that the patterns of temporal variations in cumulated slip can change with time. The changes of U c and η with time should play the main roles.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…, heart beat rhythm 5,6 , human walking motion 7,8 , circadian clock 9,10 , oscillation in chemical reactions 11,12 and earthquake dynamics. 13 In short, systems with dynamical elements that compose of spontaneous rhythms are used for Phase Response Curves (PRCs).…”
Section: -4mentioning
confidence: 99%