2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.05.05.20092130
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phasic containment of COVID-19 in substantially affected states of India

Abstract: The spread of COVID-19 epidemic in some highly-impacted Indian states displayed a characteristic subexponential growth projected up to 3 May 2020, as a consequence of lockdown strategies, in addition to improvement of reproduction number (R), serial interval, and daily growth rate, but not case fatality rate (CFR). The effect of COVID-19 containment was more prominent in second phase of lockdown with declining R, which was still >1, suggesting the requirement of sustained interventions for effective containmen… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Originally, this method was employed for comprehensive CFR estimation of COVID-19, by Yang, et al [11], and later by Oztoprak, et al [12], in order to re lect the good estimates of CFRs for different countries. Herein, the estimated CFR for the world (excluding China) and for the countries outside China is similar: 6.81% (by WHO estimates) and ~13% (by 14-day delay estimates), suggesting that the global (excluding China) situation is reasonably scary, considering the fact that China, so far, has effectively controlled the disease (COVID-19), which was caused by the novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, for which there are no speci ic medicine as well as vaccine [16,17], and therefore, the non-pharmaceutical measures remain the only options for COVID-19 management [18][19][20]. As per the current report the average CFR of COVID-19 in China was 6.1% that alleviated to 5.7% in April, while the value was recorded as 1% in China excluding Hubei province [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originally, this method was employed for comprehensive CFR estimation of COVID-19, by Yang, et al [11], and later by Oztoprak, et al [12], in order to re lect the good estimates of CFRs for different countries. Herein, the estimated CFR for the world (excluding China) and for the countries outside China is similar: 6.81% (by WHO estimates) and ~13% (by 14-day delay estimates), suggesting that the global (excluding China) situation is reasonably scary, considering the fact that China, so far, has effectively controlled the disease (COVID-19), which was caused by the novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, for which there are no speci ic medicine as well as vaccine [16,17], and therefore, the non-pharmaceutical measures remain the only options for COVID-19 management [18][19][20]. As per the current report the average CFR of COVID-19 in China was 6.1% that alleviated to 5.7% in April, while the value was recorded as 1% in China excluding Hubei province [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Herein, the estimated CFR for the world (excluding China) and for the countries outside China is similar: 6.81% (by WHO estimates) and ~13% (by 14-day delay estimates), suggesting that the global (excluding China) situation is reasonably scary, considering the fact that China, so far, has effectively controlled the disease (COVID-19), which was caused by the novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, for which there are no speci c medicine as well as vaccine 16,17 , and therefore, the non-pharmaceutical measures remain the only options for COVID-19 management. [18][19][20] While China has contained the COVID-19 pandemic it is escalating in rest of the world, however, the disease severity has been improved with a reduction of CFR from 7.04% (on May 2, 2020) to 5.9% (on June 6, 2020), and the value was decreased to 4.78% during May 2, 2020 to June 6, 2020, compared to the value of 6.81% estimated during February 8, 2020 to April 25, 2020, following regression model analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alongside the reproduction number that determines the transmissibility of SARS-COV-2, CFR (case fatality rate) represents one of the most vital factors in demonstrating the severity of this novel infectious disease, critical for policy decisions on optimal healthcare facility allotment. Currently, as of May 10, 2020, based upon the total deaths as the numerator and the total confirmed cases as the denominator, also known as confirmed CFR (cCFR) of COVID-19 was 7% globally, while the highest cCFR of 14.78% was noted for the United Kingdom, which were much higher compared to that demonstrated for India (3.35%-3.11%) [6,7]. When the pandemic is still ongoing, the cCFR, is presumed to be an overvaluation of disease severity likely due to low detection of asymptomatic cases and underestimation of CFR due to the right-censoring of cases related to the time delay from symptom onset to death [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%