2016
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool

Abstract: PHASTER (PHAge Search Tool – Enhanced Release) is a significant upgrade to the popular PHAST web server for the rapid identification and annotation of prophage sequences within bacterial genomes and plasmids. Although the steps in the phage identification pipeline in PHASTER remain largely the same as in the original PHAST, numerous software improvements and significant hardware enhancements have now made PHASTER faster, more efficient, more visually appealing and much more user friendly. In particular, PHASTE… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
2,708
1
12

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,104 publications
(2,733 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
12
2,708
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Both are described as pathogenic bacteria. We then identified important differences between them, by comparing the prophage sequences annotated using PHASTER (e < 10 −4 ) (Arndt et al, 2016). Two prophage regions were annotated in the genome of the human microbiome isolate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both are described as pathogenic bacteria. We then identified important differences between them, by comparing the prophage sequences annotated using PHASTER (e < 10 −4 ) (Arndt et al, 2016). Two prophage regions were annotated in the genome of the human microbiome isolate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pauca (henceforth referred to as "alignment reference genome") based on a BLAST+ analysis performed on a local computer, with default options and parameter values of 50% lower -70% upper cut-off for identity and E-value threshold of 10 _ 5 . The online software PHASTER (faster version of the PHAST phage search tool) (Arndt et al 2016) was used to identify DNA prophage regions in the chromosome drafts of the four available ST53 isolates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the ResFinder 3.0 (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk//services/ResFinder/) (Zankari et al, 2012) and PathogenFinder 1.1 (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/PathogenFinder/) (Cosentino et al, 2013) were used for identifying the acquired antibiotic resistance genes and pathogenicity factors, respectively. Clustered regularly interspersed short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and prophage sequences were identified by CRISPR Finder (http://crispr.i2bc.paris-saclay.fr/Server/) (Grissa et al, 2007) and PHASTER (http://phaster.ca/) (Arndt et al, 2016), respectively. The predicted genes were annotated against the restriction enzyme database (REBASE, http://tools.neb.com/genomes/) (Roberts et al, 2015) for searching restriction enzyme.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%