Phenological Analysis of the Last Glacial Vertebrates from the Territory of Moravia (the Czech Republic) – Continuity and Change in Faunistic Communities

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>Due to the vertical zonality of the studied area, its environment varied greatly over a relatively short distance within the same time span. It is possible to distinguish the following different types of environment: (1) Alluvial floodplains around larger water flows. I assume in the Last Glacial there was continuous coniferous forest, with occasional sporadic occurrences of thermophilous deciduous trees in favourable locations mainly in south Moravia. (2) Lower foothills up to about 300 m a.s.l. along the floodplains, probably the most widespread type of environment in the studied area. Open grasslands with isolated trees and shrubs were predominant. (3) At the higher altitudes of the hills (ca. 300-500 m a.s.l.) there was only steppe. (4) The highest parts of highlands and the mountains (500-1,400 m a.s.l.). During the cold and dry events these areas were mostly without grassy vegetation. The boundaries of the above mentioned environments fluctuated throughout the whole of the Last Glacial. A series of new investigations of Last Glacial Moravian sites took place over the recent decades. The result was a relatively large amount of fossil vertebrate findings, from karst areas (caves), and from open air sites. All findings were assigned to precisely defined layers which were in most cases radiometrically and/or archaeologically dated. It allowed association of the fauna communities with stratigraphical events and therefore produced a clearer picture of changes during the entire Last Glacial. The study showed that the species structure of the communities was not stable during the Last Glacial. The changes did not exhibit gradual linear development. The time span of the individual communities varied greatly. In two cases a total species change occurred very rapidly. In other cases the changes occurred over a longer period of time and may have involved penetration of new species into existing communities to a significant extent. The changes of communities associated with single stratigraphical events were palaeoecologically evaluated. In comparison with changes in the environment, I can conclude that both changes occurred simultaneously. I am therefore convinced that the primary impulse for community change was induced by environmental change. The Eemian communities of regions east of Germany differ from coeval communities of Western and the west part of Central Europe. This difference was driven by variation in precipitation, a more humid climate in the West and continental climate in the East. We have therefore two different Eemian provinces in Central Europe, the more humid west (oceanic weather) and the drier east (continental weather). The first half of the Last Glacial, about 40 ka from its beginning, had a wide range of climatic oscillations of different intensity. In layers of Moravian localities with interglacial species, the numbers of finds are always limited (small number). They were previously assigned to the Eemian. The earlier stratigraphic scale of the Late Pleistocene corresponded with this view. According to recent opinion, however, the rare finds of interglacial species in these localities are not from the Eemian interglacial, but from the first interstadials of the Last Glacial. Larger temperature oscillations occurred only in the second half of the Last Glacial and the most significant cooling was at the very end of this time. In the first occurrence of the typical Holocene assemblage in the Moravian Karst there are still some species which are typical for the Last Glacial (reindeer and lemmings). Lemmings died out first, but reindeer survived up to the Neolithic age. This area had, and still has today, differing environments within a relatively short distance caused by vertical zonation. There was a significantly colder climate in the deep and relatively narrow valleys. The upper part of the insolation slopes was mainly covered with grass and the average annual temperature there was much higher than in the valleys. This was reflected of course in the fauna. The in-migration of animals was not only via a meridional route. Migration was not only caused by oscillation of the average temperature or rainfall, but also by the need to find the best conditions for living. Seasonal migration was caused mainly by annual changes in the energy value of the food plants.</jats:p>

THE LATE PLEISTOCENE HISTORY OF THE BROWN BEAR URSUS ARCTOS LINNAEUS, 1758 IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC

“…The dates obtained for brown bears from the Martina Cave (Bohemian Karst) agree with previously published data (Wagner et al 2016). In most cases, cultural archaeological levels containing brown bear remains are well dated, and ages are consistent, as in the case of Gravettian sites, such as Dolní Věstonice 1 and 2, Pavlov, and Předmostí (Musil 1959(Musil , 1967(Musil , 1994b(Musil , 1997a(Musil , 2003a(Musil , 2003b(Musil , 2018Wojtal et al 2012). Some dates obtained for calcined bones, such as those from the Jáchymka Cave (Poz-89020) and Martina Cave (Poz-80462, Poz-86748, Poz-86749), yielded collagen lower than 1%, and the validity of these dates was restricted.…”

“…However, its taxonomic position was later revised, and it is now considered to be a synonym for U. a. priscus s. l. (Baryshnikov 2007;Marciszak et al 2019;Marciszak and Lipecki 2020;Stefaniak et al 2021). The presence of this form during MIS 5e is rarely documented in the Czech territory, e.g., from layers 13-9 of the Kůlna Cave (Musil 2010(Musil , 2018, as well as from the Chlupác ˇova Cave (Mostecký 1961(Mostecký , 1963(Mostecký , 1969Wagner 2001).…”

The first record of Cuon alpinus (Pallas, 1811) from Poland and the possible impact of other large canids on the evolution of the species

“…The presence of this species in the European Late Pleistocene was well summarized by Jánossy (1986, p. 136): ‘An important time‐marker is the alpine wolf ( Cuon alpinus ), which is an indicator of the typical “Mousterian” Palaeolithic culture’. In Central Europe, on the extensive Czech, Moravian and Silesian plains, dominated by numerous herds of large, massive cave wolves Canis lupus spelaeus Goldfuss, 1823, there was no place for the dhole (Musil, 2018; Marciszak et al ., 2020). The presence of the dhole from that period is known mainly from highlands and mountains, such as the Kraków–Częstochowa Upland, Moravian Karst, or Sudety Mts, where the type of environment made it possible to avoid pressure from the wolf.…”

“…The presence of the dhole from that period is known mainly from highlands and mountains, such as the Kraków–Częstochowa Upland, Moravian Karst, or Sudety Mts, where the type of environment made it possible to avoid pressure from the wolf. The dhole disappeared in Central Europe before the LGM (Last Glacial Maximum) (Musil, 2018; Marciszak et al ., 2020). Its presence is no longer recorded in any of the cave or open‐air sites in Bohemia, Moravia or Silesia, where the number of wolves remains reaches several hundred in each site (Wojtal et al ., 2020).…”

The history of bears (Ursidae, Carnivora, Mammalia) from Silesia (southern Poland) and the neighbouring areas

“…The fearsome and im mense steppe brown bear be came so large that in the past their re mains were mis iden ti fied as cave bear, and it was rather for mi da ble kleptoparasite rather than ac tive hunter ( Fig. 5; Marciszak et al, 2016;Musil, 2018;Marciszak et al, 2019aMarciszak et al, , b, 2020.…”