1997
DOI: 10.1295/polymj.29.147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenomenological Effects of Solvent-Casting Conditions on Pore Characteristics of Regenerated Cellulose Membranes

Abstract: ABSTRACT:An attempt was made (1) to prepare porous regenerated cellulose membranes by casting cellulose cuprammonium solutions and then immersing them into aqueous acetone solutions as coagulant, and (2) to investigate membrane characteristics such as radius of secondary particles S2 on the surfaces of the membranes, mean pore diameter measured by the water-flow-rate method 2rr, membrane porosity by apparent density method Pr(d3), and membrane thickness of dry membrane La, and (3) to clarify phenomenological e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When PEG concentration was higher, e.g., 60% or more, higher number of PEG‐rich domains had the possibility to collide and agglomerate resulting in lower number of domains but of bigger size. Our observation is in agreement with Kamide's theory on particle growth during membrane formation 38, 39. The PEG‐rich domains sediment resulting in their preferable accumulation near the surface of glass Petri dish.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…When PEG concentration was higher, e.g., 60% or more, higher number of PEG‐rich domains had the possibility to collide and agglomerate resulting in lower number of domains but of bigger size. Our observation is in agreement with Kamide's theory on particle growth during membrane formation 38, 39. The PEG‐rich domains sediment resulting in their preferable accumulation near the surface of glass Petri dish.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…(2), and thickness of dry membrane, L d (m), into eq. (4), that was derived based on the straight through cylindrical pore model20: \font\abc=cmmib10\def\bi#1{\hbox{\abc #1}} $${\bi r} {\bi f}. = \sqrt {{{8\eta_{{\rm{H}}_{{2}} {\rm{O}}} JL_d}\over {{\bi P}_{\bi r} \Delta {\bi P}}}}$$ in which η H2O (N s m −2 ) is the viscosity of water, and Δ P (N m −2 ) is the load pressure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean pore radius, r f (m), was evaluated by means of the water-flow-rate method by substituting the experimentally determined values of porosity, P r , permeation flux, J (m 3 N m -2 N s -1 ), and thickness of dry membrane, L d (m), into Equation (4), that was derived on the basis of the straightthrough cylindrical pore model: [10] …”
Section: Porosity Of the Membranementioning
confidence: 99%