Summary:Purpose: To understand the emotional predicament in children with recently diagnosed idiopathic or cryptogenic epilepsy.Methods: We used the well-tried method of structured projection for the first time in children with epilepsy. Thirty-six children with epilepsy, aged 7-15 years (mean age, 9.5 years) and in 35 control children aged 7-15 years (mean age, 9.4 years), attributed shame and guilt in relation to three types of situation (non-illness related, illness related, and epilepsy related). Children were evaluated twice: shortly after diagnosis, before antiepileptic drug (AED) use and after an interval of 3 months.Results: Children with epilepsy and healthy controls were similar in their way of attributing shame and guilt. However, the type of situation was of influence: Both children with epilepsy and healthy children attributed more shame to incompetence due to epilepsy than to incompetence due to other illnesses.Conclusions: Increased affective problems in childhood epilepsy cannot be explained by excessive attribution of shame and guilt, affects known to be important precursors of psychopathology, yet both healthy children and children with epilepsy attribute more shame to epilepsy than to other illnesses. Epilepsy is not like any other disease. Key Words: EpilepsyChildren-Shame-Guilt-Ps ychopathology .In epilepsy, affective problems abound (1-4). More than 25% of children with normal intelligence and relatively benign epilepsy have signs of depression, but these are apparently not always recognized by carers (5). We have attempted to understand the affective predicament of children with epilepsy by concentrating on the affects of shame and guilt. Both are negative but normal adaptive affects (6). The question addressed by this study is whether children with recently diagnosed epilepsy differ from healthy matched control children in their attributions of shame and guilt. Currently it is reasoned that psychopathology develops from intrinsically normal affective reactions. Recurring affects induce a proneness to react to these affects (7). Proneness distorts cognition, biases action and perception, and thus leads to maladaptiveness. Maladaptiveness in turn leads to affective distress (8). The relevance of the affects of shame and guilt for later psychopathology has been noted since Freud (cited in 6). In children, proneness to shame and/or