Horsáková J., Krška B. (2016): Evaluation of dormancy break in some selected peach (Prunus persica) cultivars. Hort. Sci. (Prague), 43: 181-187.The evaluation of dormancy break based on the number of flower buds in bloom was performed in years 2011-2013 (January-April) for 15 peach cultivars compared to the control cv. Redhaven. Based on the date of endogenous dormancy break the evaluated peach cultivars could be classified into three groups consisting of: (1) cultivars with an early break of dormancy, (2) cultivars with a medium-early break of dormancy and (3) cultivars with a late break of dormancy. For individual cultivars, the duration of the dormancy period was influenced by meteorological conditions existing in a given year.
Keywords:Prunus persica (L.) Batsch; endogenous dormancy; length of dormancy; flower buds Similarly to apricot and almond trees, peaches are sensitive to frost damage, especially during spring months when abrupt drops in air temperatures may occur. In winter, buds are already dormant so they are usually not damaged by frosts. This means that dormancy is one of the most important adaptation mechanisms that enable the survival of perennial plants in winter periods of low temperatures (Taylor 2008; Leida 2012). The process of dormancy thus determines how the woody fruit species can survive during the winter season and early spring without any damage to shoots and, above all, flower buds (Allona et al. 2008). The final number of flowers that remain after budding or (better to say) the density of their setting is an important factor that influences the fruit-bearing of peach trees. The process of the development of flower buds in individual genotypes and cultivars is genetically fixed. Certain changes in the character of the development of flower buds can be caused by the manner of cultivation, environmental conditions and by some other factors, e.g. age of the orchard, health condition of trees, rootstock, growing technology etc. (Hauagge, Cummins 1991;Fan et al. 2010). Dormancy has been studied and reviewed by many authors. Lang et al. (1987) defined several stages of dormancy, viz. paradormancy, endodormancy and ecodormancy. Both exogenous and endogenous factors that influence this process were studied and analysed in many research studies. As far exogenous factors were concerned, effects of day length and temperature were investigated while studies on effects of endogenous factors were focused on the role of growth regulators, regulation of the cell cycle, water, chromatin modification etc. (Arora et al. 2003;Horvath et al. 2003;Rohde, Bhalerao 2007;Allona et al. 2008). At present, the research is focused on genetic and molecular aspects of dormancy and deals with mechanisms that regulate both endodormancy and the