2017
DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenotypic Antibiotic Resistance in ZEUS: A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind Phase 2/3 Study of ZTI-01 vs. Piperacillin-Tazobactam (P-T) in the Treatment of Patients with Complicated Urinary Tract Infections (cUTI) Including Acute Pyelonephritis (AP)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference might be explained by the epidemiology, susceptibility, and MIC distributions of fosfomycin against CRE. MICs of fosfomycin against CRE in our study (MIC 90 > 1024 mg/L) were higher than that of the previous studies (MICs 0.5 to >512 mg/L) [36,37]. Additionally, our study showed that most of Enterobacterales clinical isolates were Klebsiella pneumoniae.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference might be explained by the epidemiology, susceptibility, and MIC distributions of fosfomycin against CRE. MICs of fosfomycin against CRE in our study (MIC 90 > 1024 mg/L) were higher than that of the previous studies (MICs 0.5 to >512 mg/L) [36,37]. Additionally, our study showed that most of Enterobacterales clinical isolates were Klebsiella pneumoniae.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…The previous studies demonstrated that the combination therapy of IVFOS with other antibiotics was associated with a reduction of mortality in critically ill patients with CRE infections [34,35]. However, some previous studies showed that IVFOS monotherapy was associated with high clinical cure rate (100%) and microbiological eradication (56%) in patients with acute pyelonephritis caused by CRE [36,37]. The difference might be explained by the epidemiology, susceptibility, and MIC distributions of fosfomycin against CRE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although few clinical studies evaluating FOS in CI or PI against Gram-positive bacteria are available to-date, this review suggests potential benefits from the use of this antibiotic in this setting [18,19,27,31,32]. This is interesting if we take into consideration the anti-biofilm properties of FOS, against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains [45,46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Fourteen studies investigated FOS dosing regimens in the setting of Gram-negative bacteria (2 in vivo studies, 8 simulation studies, 4 clinical trials, 1 review [4,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]), while FOS dosing regimens against Gram-positive bacteria were evaluated in 5 studies (2 in vitro studies, 2 clinical trials, 1 review [18,19,27,31,32]). One study [33] did not evaluate the activity of FOS administered in CI since its objective was to report PK/ PD parameters in healthy volunteers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation