2018
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenotyping of Arabidopsis Drought Stress Response Using Kinetic Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Multicolor Fluorescence Imaging

Abstract: Plant responses to drought stress are complex due to various mechanisms of drought avoidance and tolerance to maintain growth. Traditional plant phenotyping methods are labor-intensive, time-consuming, and subjective. Plant phenotyping by integrating kinetic chlorophyll fluorescence with multicolor fluorescence imaging can acquire plant morphological, physiological, and pathological traits related to photosynthesis as well as its secondary metabolites, which will provide a new means to promote the progress of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
93
2
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
9
93
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Reduction in Fv/Fm values present characteristics of photoinhibition and the small decrease can be interpreted as photo-protection [54]. In our study, a small decline in Fv/Fm values only occurs upon 72 h of drought stress which are agreeable with [16,30]. The maximal quantum efficiency of PSII was almost unaffected until the last time point of drought stress considering generally an insensitive and might not be a good indicator for short term of drought stress.…”
Section: Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Multicolor Analyses Under Drougsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Reduction in Fv/Fm values present characteristics of photoinhibition and the small decrease can be interpreted as photo-protection [54]. In our study, a small decline in Fv/Fm values only occurs upon 72 h of drought stress which are agreeable with [16,30]. The maximal quantum efficiency of PSII was almost unaffected until the last time point of drought stress considering generally an insensitive and might not be a good indicator for short term of drought stress.…”
Section: Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Multicolor Analyses Under Drougsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The increase in blue, green and red fluorescence may due to the higher content of phenolic compounds and accumulation of intermediary compounds during chlorophyll breakdown, as it is considered as an adaptation mechanism of the photosynthetic apparatus to drought stress [58]. Conversely, IrF values of all the three varieties were reduced in response to drought stress which was due to the lack of reabsorption of the emitted chlorophyll fluorescence [30]. Similarly, we witnessed an increase in the values of F690/F740 in the drought-stressed plants of the three varieties earlier on 48 h (Table S2) than the symptoms appears in plants upon 72 h of drought stress which caused a significant reduction in chlorophyll content ( Figure 2C).…”
Section: Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Multicolor Analyses Under Drougmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…typing under controlled environments (Bao et al, 2019b;Granier et al, 2004;Skirycz et al, 2011;Serrand et al, 2013;Fujita et al, 2018). Various advanced sensor technologies have been successfully integrated into phenotyping systems, including visible RGB imaging (Minervini et al, 2014;Clauw et al, 2015), chlorophyll fluorescence imaging (Rousseau et al, 2013;Yao et al, 2018), thermal imaging (Zia et al, 2013;Klem et al, 2017), and hyperspectral imaging (Ge et al, 2016;Behmann et al, 2018). While both commercial (Skirycz et al, 2011;Neumann et al, 2015) and custom-built platforms (Apelt et al, 2015;Tisne et al, 2013) have been created, most current systems are limited to two-dimensional (2D) imaging and lack flexibility to administer different types of treatments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%