“…Indeed, the utility of computerized test batteries has been
demonstrated in a wide variety of settings, including sport head injury (Rahman-Filipiak & Woodard, 2013; Taylor, 2012), active-duty military (Cole et al, 2013), diseases of aging (Canini et al, 2014; Dwolatzky, Dimant, Simon, & Doniger, 2010; Mielke et al, 2014), epilepsy (Martinelli, Cecato, Bartholomeu, & Montiel, 2014), and
infectious diseases potentially affecting the brain (Koski et al, 2011). Batteries, such as the CANTAB (Robbins et al, 1994), PhenX Toolkit (McCarty, Berg, et al, 2014; McCarty, Huggins, et al, 2014), NIH Toolbox (Carlozzi et al, 2014; Heaton
et al, 2014; Weintraub et al,
2014), and the University of Pennsylvania Web-based Computerized Neurocognitive
Battery (WebCNP) (webcnp.med.upenn.edu/) (Gur et al,
2012; Gur et al, 2010), each use
multiple measures to assess principal cognitive domains of executive functions, several
component processes of declarative memory, visuospatial abilities, emotion
discrimination, and emotional control valid for pre-adolescence through senescence and
commonly affected in adolescents with alcohol use disorder (for review, Squeglia, Jacobus, & Tapert, 2014). Benefits of most
computerized batteries include acquisition of response time for individual trials for
every test, thereby enabling assessment of speed of responding and efficiency scores
based on speed-accuracy tradeoff (Gur et al,
2010).…”