1998
DOI: 10.1017/s1355617798466153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phonological naming therapy in jargon aphasia: Positive but paradoxical effects

Abstract: This article is a single-case investigation of phonological naming therapy. The individual involved had fluent jargon speech, with neologisms, verbal paraphasias, and paragrammatisms. The jargon was underpinned by a severe anomia. Content words were rarely accessed either in spontaneous speech or naming. Single word investigations highlighted some preserved skills. Auditory comprehension, at least for concrete words, was relatively intact and although nonwords could not be repeated, words could, and at… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some recognise their errors (e.g., Ellis, Miller, & Sin, 1983;Robson et al, 1999) and even try to correct them (Blanken, 1993;Moses et al, 2004). Graham, Patterson, and Hodges (2001) reach a similar conclusion in relation to their participant with jargonagraphia.…”
Section: Evidence Of Monitoring Failurementioning
confidence: 63%
“…Some recognise their errors (e.g., Ellis, Miller, & Sin, 1983;Robson et al, 1999) and even try to correct them (Blanken, 1993;Moses et al, 2004). Graham, Patterson, and Hodges (2001) reach a similar conclusion in relation to their participant with jargonagraphia.…”
Section: Evidence Of Monitoring Failurementioning
confidence: 63%
“…Evidently, the expected interaction between therapy type and aphasia type does not always hold, and trying to control for this interaction would not necessarily be justified. This echoes Robson et al: 30 "We are some way from understanding how therapy operates. There appears to be no clear match between the underlying deficit and the form of treatment offered.…”
Section: Moss and Nicholasmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…On the other hand, Robson, Marshall, Pring, and Chiat (1998) reported a positive effect of a cueing treatment on the process of word finding. They encouraged their participant to reflect upon the syllabic structure and first phoneme of pictured targets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%