1975
DOI: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1975.228.4.1123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phosphorylated beta-guanidinopropionate as a substitute for phosphocreatine in rat muscle

Abstract: To evaluate phosphorylated beta-guanidinopropionate (beta-GPAP) as a substitute for phosphocreatine (PC), hypoxic tibialis anterior muscles were stimulated to contract isometrically in situ until twitch tension fell to 25 percent of the peak value. Muscles from rats fed beta-guanidinopropionic acid (beta-GPA) failed to exhibit the staircase phenomenon, and they developed 28 percent less tension than control muscles. In control muscles lactate increased from 0.75 to 20.99, ADP increased from 0.89 to 1.20, ATP d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

6
28
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Substrate analogs of Cr, e.g., p-guanidinopropionic acid ((3-GPA), a poor substrate (higher Michaelis constant and lower Vmax) for CK, have also been used to decrease PCr and ATP levels. Early studies on p-GPA-fed animals led to disparate results, with some investigations finding no effect of CK inhibition on skeletal muscle function (24) and others reporting an im pairm ent of muscle force generation during repetitive activation (10,16). More recent studies on p-GPA-fed animals demonstrate a greater im pairm ent of limb muscle isometric forcegenerating capacity during the initial series of repeti tive activation, as compared with control muscle (17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Substrate analogs of Cr, e.g., p-guanidinopropionic acid ((3-GPA), a poor substrate (higher Michaelis constant and lower Vmax) for CK, have also been used to decrease PCr and ATP levels. Early studies on p-GPA-fed animals led to disparate results, with some investigations finding no effect of CK inhibition on skeletal muscle function (24) and others reporting an im pairm ent of muscle force generation during repetitive activation (10,16). More recent studies on p-GPA-fed animals demonstrate a greater im pairm ent of limb muscle isometric forcegenerating capacity during the initial series of repeti tive activation, as compared with control muscle (17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high level of CK activity found in skeletal muscle ensures th at, w hen consistent high-energy phosphate production is necessary during repetitive contractile activity, ATP levels will be m aintained at the expense of PCr. This role of CK as an ATP buffer is widely accepted (18, 33).Defining a physiological role for CK in skeletal muscle fatigue, however, has been difficult, with prior studies using substrate analogs (10,16,17,20) of Cr to assess the functional consequences of impaired CK activity. These studies have generated disparate re sults and exclusively examined fatigue under repetitive isometric conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Decrease in ATP could be caused by a decreased creatine content in muscle, which then decreases phosphocreatine (PC) (FITCH et al, 1974(FITCH et al, , 1975MAINWOOD et al, 19.82), due to an increased loss of creatine through urine as was found in coldacclimated rats by KURAHASHI and KUROSHIMA (1978). Therefore, the current study was performed to investigate how the ultrastructure of mitochondria respond when the contents of PC and ATP are decreased chronically.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In this study, rats were fed creatine-analogue f3-guanidinopropionic acid ,(f3-GPA) to decrease PC and ATP. Feeding f3-GPA lowers muscle creatine (SHIELDS and WHITEHAIR, 1973), PC (FITCH et al, 1974(FITCH et al, , 1975MAINWOOD et al, 1982), and ATP (FITCH et al, 1974(FITCH et al, , 1975MAINWOOD et al, 1982) because /3-GPA inhibits creatine entry into muscle from plasma (FITCH et al, 1968;SHIELDS and WHITEHAIR, 1973).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%