2023
DOI: 10.1101/2023.02.23.529712
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phosphorylation motif dictates GPCR C-terminal domain conformation and arrestin interaction

Abstract: Arrestin dependent G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling pathway is regulated by the phosphorylation state of GPCR′s C-terminal domain, but the molecular bases of arrestin:receptor interaction are to be further illuminated. Here we investigated the impact of phosphorylation on the conformational features of the C-terminal region from three Rhodopsin-like GPCRs, the vasopressin V2 Receptor (V2R), the Growth Hormone Secretagogue or ghrelin Receptor type 1a (GHSR) and the β2-Adernergic Receptor (β2AR). Usin… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For β-arrestin 1, we selected position 167 and 191, as they should report on the position of the receptor with respect to the arrestin N-and C-lobe. Moreover, these positions had already been modified for β-arrestin 1 intramolecular FRET experiments, and this has been shown not to affect the functional properties of this protein with regard to its interaction with GHSR in nanodiscs 30 . Although the 71 1.60 :167 distance poorly discriminates the different orientations of β-arrestin in the receptor:arrestin complex (Figure 5), it nevertheless reports on the core engagement of β-arrestin with GHSR, and as such allows to rule out any possible tail-only engaged complex.…”
Section: Pi(45)p2 Favors the Interaction Of Arrestin With Ghsrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For β-arrestin 1, we selected position 167 and 191, as they should report on the position of the receptor with respect to the arrestin N-and C-lobe. Moreover, these positions had already been modified for β-arrestin 1 intramolecular FRET experiments, and this has been shown not to affect the functional properties of this protein with regard to its interaction with GHSR in nanodiscs 30 . Although the 71 1.60 :167 distance poorly discriminates the different orientations of β-arrestin in the receptor:arrestin complex (Figure 5), it nevertheless reports on the core engagement of β-arrestin with GHSR, and as such allows to rule out any possible tail-only engaged complex.…”
Section: Pi(45)p2 Favors the Interaction Of Arrestin With Ghsrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, pH 7.4 buffer, active receptor fractions were purified using affinity chromatography with the biotinylated JMV2959 and homogeneous fractions of GHSR-containing discs finally obtained through a size-exclusion chromatography step on a S200 increase column (10/300 GL) using a 25 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, pH 7.4 buffer as the eluent. The full-length cysteine-free β-arrestin 1 mutant and its pre-activated version (truncation at residue 382) with reactive cysteines at positions 68, 167 or 191 were produced as recently described 30 . For LRET measurement, a truncated receptor where a sortase ligation consensus sequence (LPERGGH) replaced the 346-366 region was produced using the protocol described above.…”
Section: Optimizing En For Isolated β-Arrestinmentioning
confidence: 99%