2017
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b09513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photo-CIDNP Reveals Different Protonation Sites Depending on the Primary Step of the Photoinduced Electron-/Proton-Transfer Process with Ru(II) Polyazaaromatic Complexes

Abstract: The excited-state quenching of [Ru(TAP)(HAT)] (TAP = 1,4,5,8-tetraazaphenanthrene, HAT= 1,4,5,8,9,12-hexaazatriphenylene) by hydroquinone (HQ), N-acetyl-tyrosine (N-Ac-Tyr) or guanosine-5'-monophosphate (GMP) was investigated at various pH values. The quenching occurs via electron/proton transfer, as evidenced by transient absorption spectroscopy and confirmed by H photochemically induced dynamic nuclear polarization (photo-CIDNP). Reductive quenching also occurs in strongly acidic solution despite a much shor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the 2 LMCT character of 1 + * leads to a mono-reduced complex with a reduced iron­(II) metal center. This is unlike prototypical MLCT excited states where the reduced photocatalyst has an electron localized on a bipyridine ligand. Hence reductive quenching of an LMCT excited state results in vectorial electron transfer away from the donor, a process desired for applications in photoredox chemistry and solar energy conversion. In contrast, reductive quenching of an MLCT excited state results in non-vectorial electron transfer that leaves a ligand-localized electron proximate to the electron donor, which may promote strong electronic coupling and enhance charge recombination.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the 2 LMCT character of 1 + * leads to a mono-reduced complex with a reduced iron­(II) metal center. This is unlike prototypical MLCT excited states where the reduced photocatalyst has an electron localized on a bipyridine ligand. Hence reductive quenching of an LMCT excited state results in vectorial electron transfer away from the donor, a process desired for applications in photoredox chemistry and solar energy conversion. In contrast, reductive quenching of an MLCT excited state results in non-vectorial electron transfer that leaves a ligand-localized electron proximate to the electron donor, which may promote strong electronic coupling and enhance charge recombination.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 An isotope effect is also observed when [Ru(TAP)2(dppz)] 2+ oxidizes 5′-GMP 12 and CIDNP studies with other [Ru(TAP)2L 2+ complexes suggest that this process might proceed by PCET within the solvent cage resulting in the formation of Ru(TAP)(TAPH)(dppz)] 2+ (equation 4). [13][14][15][16] [Ru(TAP)2(dppz)]…”
Section: Dft Calculations On the Electronic And Vibrational Absorptiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently a series of detailed photo-CIDNP (chemically induced dynamic nuclear polarization) studies of the reduction of various [Ru(TAP)2(L)] 2+ with 5′-GMP and other reducing biomolecules have been reported by Kirsch-De Mesmaeker, Luhmer and coworkers. [13][14][15][16] With 5′-GMP as quencher, strongly enhanced absorption signals are found, predominantly for the 2,7-TAP protons (much weaker for the 3,6-TAP protons and absent for the 9,10-TAP protons) (see Figure 1 for the numbering of atoms in TAP), while a strong effect is also observed for the H8 of the GMP. This result is consistent with formation of the reduced metal complex and the oxidized nucleotide in the solvent cage; the CIDNP signal arises because of the competition between the back-electron transfer and the escape of the two radical species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This showed the formation of a covalent photoadduct between the exocyclic amine of the guanine nucleobase and one of the TAP ligands ( Scheme 7 ) [ 125 , 126 ]. The mechanism involves the radical recombination of the protonated reduced ruthenium complex [ 127 , 128 ] and the deprotonated radical cation of guanine and rearomatisation of the nucleobase leads to the formation of the observed photoadduct. Interestingly, no bonding to the O6 centre of guanine was observed despite that radicals centred on O6 are usually the most stable.…”
Section: Ru-dna and The Antigene And Antisense Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%