2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photo-stimulated charge transfer in contact electrification coupled with plasmonic excitations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This allows the injection of hot electrons into the ITO substrate and thus leaves the Au positively charged owing to electronic depletion. 19 This charge transfer direction for Au nanoparticles with a specific l LSPR observed in our experiments is consistent with the thermodynamic model proposed by Sheldon et al, 30 see more detailed explanation in the ESI † (Fig. S2).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This allows the injection of hot electrons into the ITO substrate and thus leaves the Au positively charged owing to electronic depletion. 19 This charge transfer direction for Au nanoparticles with a specific l LSPR observed in our experiments is consistent with the thermodynamic model proposed by Sheldon et al, 30 see more detailed explanation in the ESI † (Fig. S2).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This observed slow SP decay can have multiple origins ranging from uncompensated charges with long lifetimes, to charge exchange with the ambient which is influenced via a screening effect through the formation of a water layer or from the presence of a charge-trapping layer and/or a wider Au/ITO Schottky-type interface. 17,19 To probe this further, we have conducted depthprofiling XPS measurements using low-energy monoatomic Ar + sputtering with an average sputtering rate of 1.7 Å per step. UPS measurements at these depths clearly shows the presence of a barrier (j B 0.55 eV, Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table shows the performance comparison between the as-fabricated 3DPH-based PTNG and previously reported nanogenerators. Most reported PTNGs involved TiO 2 as a photoactive material combined with a variety of different materials and involved complex device architecture, which failed to achieve high efficiency due to the large energy band gap of TiO 2 . , The high band gap value implies that TiO 2 can only respond to ultraviolet (UV) light, which accounts for less than 5% of the solar spectrum. In other reports for PTNGs, attempts were made to address the issue of large band gaps by using materials like perovskite, silicon, etc. , However, these exhibited either low stability and/or poor output performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%