2003
DOI: 10.1029/2002jd002165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoacoustic and filter‐based ambient aerosol light absorption measurements: Instrument comparisons and the role of relative humidity

Abstract: [1] Ambient measurements are reported of aerosol light absorption from photoacoustic and filter-based instruments (aethalometer and a particle soot absorption photometer (PSAP)) to provide insight on the measurement science. Measurements were obtained during the Big Bend Regional Aerosol and Visibility Observational Study at the Big Bend National Park in South Texas. The aethalometer measurements of black carbon concentration at this site correlate reasonably well with photoacoustic measurements of aerosol lig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
201
1
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(213 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
8
201
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…An average value of σ (λ) = 10.4±2.0 m 2 g −1 was obtained and used to calculate the EBC presented in this work. Absorption cross sections between 7 m 2 g −1 and 11 m 2 g −1 are usually reported in literature (see for example Bond and Bergstrom, 2006;Fernández-Camacho et al, 2010;He et al, 2009;Barnard et al, 2008;Arnott et al, 2003Arnott et al, , 2005Reche et al, 2011)). …”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An average value of σ (λ) = 10.4±2.0 m 2 g −1 was obtained and used to calculate the EBC presented in this work. Absorption cross sections between 7 m 2 g −1 and 11 m 2 g −1 are usually reported in literature (see for example Bond and Bergstrom, 2006;Fernández-Camacho et al, 2010;He et al, 2009;Barnard et al, 2008;Arnott et al, 2003Arnott et al, , 2005Reche et al, 2011)). …”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, laboratory comparisons between the PAS and difference method suggest that the PAS can determine aerosol absorption with an accuracy <10% (Moosmüller et al, 1998;Arnott et al, 1999;Arnott et al, 2003;Sheridan et al, 2005).…”
Section: Problems Related To the Measurement Of Aerosol Light Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparisons of simultaneous measurements made using PAS and filter-based techniques (PSAP, aethalometer, integrating plate) show considerable differences (up to a factor of two) under some circumstances, especially when the relative humidity is variable (Moosmüller et al, 1998;Arnott et al, 1999;Arnott et al, 2003;Sheridan et al, 2005). The most reliable filter-based instrument for absorption measurements at this time is the multi-angle absorption photometer (MAAP), which simultaneously measures transmittance and reflectance of the filter at multiple angles and uses a twostream radiative transfer model to determine the filter and aerosol scattering corrections for the absorption measurement (Petzold and Schönlinner, 2004).…”
Section: Problems Related To the Measurement Of Aerosol Light Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 m 2 g often used for urban aerosols (Moosmuller, 1998), 8-10 m 2 g (at 550 nm) in Mexico City (Barnard, 2005), 8.5 m 2 g from BRAVO (Big Bend Regional Aerosol and Visibility Observation Study) (Arnott, 2003). The conversion factor 8.28 m 2 g was also used in a study by Yan et al (2008) for obtaining the aerosol absorption over a rural site in North China.…”
Section: Measurements and Instrumentationsmentioning
confidence: 99%