2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2022.109238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photocatalytic foams for water treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a photocatalytic solid‐phase load, the foam has the advantages of easy production, low cost, lightweight, and excellent mechanical properties. [ 95 ] However, the foaming method is difficult to mass‐produce, and the photocatalyst distribution is uneven. Scholars have tried to use different methods to prepare foamy photocatalytic membranes and cut them into thin slices, which have shown excellent photocatalytic properties.…”
Section: Photocatalytic Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a photocatalytic solid‐phase load, the foam has the advantages of easy production, low cost, lightweight, and excellent mechanical properties. [ 95 ] However, the foaming method is difficult to mass‐produce, and the photocatalyst distribution is uneven. Scholars have tried to use different methods to prepare foamy photocatalytic membranes and cut them into thin slices, which have shown excellent photocatalytic properties.…”
Section: Photocatalytic Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Supported photocatalysts do not require downstream removal, but lower surface areas result in lower treatment efficiencies. 22 In addition, there are issues of shadowing, where the non-transparent support material blocks irradiation of the photocatalyst. 23 Photocatalytic foams, are an emerging alternative to slurry and supported catalysts, 22 integrating the benets of both, while mitigating the drawbacks associated with each.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Supported photocatalysts do not require downstream removal, but lower surface areas result in lower treatment efficiencies. 22 In addition, there are issues of shadowing, where the non-transparent support material blocks irradiation of the photocatalyst. 23…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering these factors, various styles of photocatalytic membranes have been fabricated by loading catalysts onto plastic, ceramic, metal mesh/foam, and glass substrates through electrospinning, spraying, and other processes. [6][7][8][9][10] Low-cost and highly stable polymers, such as polyacrylonitrile (PAN), poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF), polystyrene (PS), polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU), and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), are usually used as substrate and binder in the photocatalytic membrane. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] However, the existing photocatalytic membranes are vulnerable to serious catalyst leaching (binder decomposition by photocatalytic reaction) and micropollutant cover fouling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%